X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/a8e3040d0aa6c717bec072bff9cd80223e399a0c..e40c8a6a039fcfb60fc4ff8bc03838c1f1d96efa:/doc/todo/headless_git_branches.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/headless_git_branches.mdwn b/doc/todo/headless_git_branches.mdwn
index 8a1e68201..bedf21d0c 100644
--- a/doc/todo/headless_git_branches.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/headless_git_branches.mdwn
@@ -6,46 +6,100 @@ Ikiwiki should really survive being asked to work with a git branch that has no
     git clone barerepo.git srcdir
     ikiwiki --rcs=git srcdir destdir
 
-I've fixed this initial construction case, and, based on my testing, I've also fixed the post-update executing on a new master, and ikiwiki.cgi executing on a non-existent master cases. Unfortunately these cases still generate a lot of warnings from recentchanges; I suspect a much more invasive patch would be needed to shut those up.
+I've fixed this initial construction case, and, based on my testing, I've
+also fixed the post-update executing on a new master, and ikiwiki.cgi
+executing on a non-existent master cases.
 
 Please commit so my users stop whining at me about having clean branches to push to, the big babies.
 
-Summary: Change three scary loud failure cases related to empty branches into three scary loud success cases.
+Summary: Change three scary loud failure cases related to empty branches into three mostly quiet success cases.
+
+[[!tag patch]]
+
+> FWIW, [[The_TOVA_Company]] apparently wants this feature (and I hope
+> I don't mind that I mention they were willing to pay someone for it,
+> but I told them I'd not done any of the work. :) )
+> 
+> Code review follows, per hunk.. --[[Joey]] 
+
 <pre>
 diff --git a/IkiWiki/Plugin/git.pm b/IkiWiki/Plugin/git.pm
-index cf7fbe9..5b1e334 100644
+index cf7fbe9..e5bafcf 100644
 --- a/IkiWiki/Plugin/git.pm
 +++ b/IkiWiki/Plugin/git.pm
-@@ -439,10 +439,13 @@ sub git_commit_info ($;$) {
+@@ -439,17 +439,21 @@ sub git_commit_info ($;$) {
  
  	my @opts;
  	push @opts, "--max-count=$num" if defined $num;
-+        my @raw_lines;
- 
+-
 -	my @raw_lines = run_or_die('git', 'log', @opts,
 -		'--pretty=raw', '--raw', '--abbrev=40', '--always', '-c',
 -		'-r', $sha1, '--', '.');
-+        if (-e $config{srcdir} . "/.git/refs/heads/" . $config{gitmaster_branch}) {
-+                @raw_lines = run_or_die('git', 'log', @opts,
-+                        '--pretty=raw', '--raw', '--abbrev=40', '--always', '-c',
-+                        '-r', $sha1, '--', '.');
-+        };
- 
+-
++	my @raw_lines;
  	my @ci;
- 	while (my $parsed = parse_diff_tree(\@raw_lines)) {
-@@ -474,7 +477,10 @@ sub rcs_update () {
+-	while (my $parsed = parse_diff_tree(\@raw_lines)) {
+-		push @ci, $parsed;
+-	}
++        
++	# Test to see if branch actually exists yet.
++	if (run_or_non('git', 'show-ref', '--quiet', '--verify', '--', 'refs/heads/' . $config{gitmaster_branch}) ) {
++		@raw_lines = run_or_die('git', 'log', @opts,
++			'--pretty=raw', '--raw', '--abbrev=40', '--always', '-c',
++			'-r', $sha1, '--', '.');
++
++		while (my $parsed = parse_diff_tree(\@raw_lines)) {
++			push @ci, $parsed;
++		}
+ 
+-	warn "Cannot parse commit info for '$sha1' commit" if !@ci;
++		warn "Cannot parse commit info for '$sha1' commit" if !@ci;
++	};
+ 
+ 	return wantarray ? @ci : $ci[0];
+ }
+</pre>
+
+My concern is that this adds a bit of slowdown (git show-ref is fast, but
+It's still extra work) to a very hot code path that is run to eg,
+update recentchanges after every change. 
+
+Seems not ideal to do extra work every time to handle a case
+that will literally happen a maximum of once in the entire lifecycle of a
+wiki (and zero times more typically, since the setup automator puts in a
+.gitignore file that works around this problem).
+
+So as to not just say "no" ... what if it always tried to run git log,
+and if it failed (or returned no parsed lines), then it could look 
+at git show-ref to deduce whether to throw an error or not.
+--[[Joey]] 
+
+> Ah, but then git-log would still complain "bad revision 'HEAD'"
+> --[[Joey]] 
+
+<pre>
+@@ -474,7 +478,10 @@ sub rcs_update () {
  	# Update working directory.
  
  	if (length $config{gitorigin_branch}) {
 -		run_or_cry('git', 'pull', '--prune', $config{gitorigin_branch});
-+                run_or_cry('git', 'fetch', '--prune', $config{gitorigin_branch});
-+                if (-e $config{srcdir} . '/.git/refs/remotes/' . $config{gitorigin_branch} . '/' . $config{gitmaster_branch}) {
-+                        run_or_cry('git', 'merge', $config{gitorigin_branch} . '/' . $config{gitmaster_branch});
-+                }
++		run_or_cry('git', 'fetch', '--prune', $config{gitorigin_branch});
++		if (run_or_non('git', 'show-ref', '--quiet', '--verify', '--', 'refs/remotes/' . $config{gitorigin_branch} . '/' . $config{gitmaster_branch}) ) {
++			run_or_cry('git', 'merge', $config{gitorigin_branch} . '/' . $config{gitmaster_branch});
++		}
  	}
  }
- 
-@@ -559,7 +565,7 @@ sub rcs_commit_helper (@) {
+
+</pre>
+
+Same concern here about extra work. Code path is nearly as hot, being
+called on every refresh. Probably could be dealt with similarly as above.
+
+Also, is there any point in breaking the pull up into a
+fetch followed by a merge? --[[Joey]] 
+
+<pre>
+@@ -559,7 +566,7 @@ sub rcs_commit_helper (@) {
  	# So we should ignore its exit status (hence run_or_non).
  	if (run_or_non('git', 'commit', '-m', $params{message}, '-q', @opts)) {
  		if (length $config{gitorigin_branch}) {
@@ -53,4 +107,7 @@ index cf7fbe9..5b1e334 100644
 +			run_or_cry('git', 'push', $config{gitorigin_branch}, $config{gitmaster_branch});
  		}
  	}
+ 	
 </pre>
+
+This seems fine to apply. --[[Joey]]