X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/a4f381ace837a032bc202cc6b2a98e922d4b7cfc..ab4f499c8d903b3e66655b42202a29ece975112b:/doc/todo/Separate_OpenIDs_and_usernames.mdwn?ds=sidebyside

diff --git a/doc/todo/Separate_OpenIDs_and_usernames.mdwn b/doc/todo/Separate_OpenIDs_and_usernames.mdwn
index 60b7b6c61..b7ff82282 100644
--- a/doc/todo/Separate_OpenIDs_and_usernames.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/Separate_OpenIDs_and_usernames.mdwn
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ A slightly more complex next step would be to request sreg from the provider and
 > implemented as a badly-done wart on the side of their regular login
 > system.
 > 
+> > If there are user profiles on the site with non-empty information associated with them (including permissions, reputation), then it would make more sense to be able to access your user profile with alternative OpenIDs (in case one of the provider goes down), as on <http://stackoverflow.com>. In ikiwiki, there might be no such special information associated with users (or you can think of something like this?), except for the admin rights. But fortunately, several OpenIDs can be set up for admins in ikwiki. (Only if it comes to [the OpenIDs provided by Gmail][forum/google openid broken?], then it turns out to be unhandy to write the ID into the configuration file as a second admin ID.)--Ivan Z.
+> 
 > The openid plugin now attempts to get an email and a username, and stores
 > them in the session database for later use (ie, when the user edits a
 > page).
@@ -46,8 +48,8 @@ A slightly more complex next step would be to request sreg from the provider and
 >   `openiduser`.
 >   (done)
 > * Modify comment plugin to put the session username in the comment
->   template instead of the `openiduser`.
+>   template instead of the `openiduser`. (done)
 
 Unfortunately I don't speak Perl, so hopefully someone thinks these suggestions are good enough to code up. I've hacked on openid code in Ruby before, so hopefully these changes aren't all that difficult to implement. Even if you don't get any data via sreg, you're no worse off than where you are now, so I don't think there'd need to be much in the way of error/sanity-checking of returned data. If it's null or not available then no big deal, typing in a username is no sweat.
 
-[[!tag wishlist]]
+[[!tag wishlist done]]