X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/899c319191c8f82b03f7d67f3feeeae437423e2f..cab2f55b6aa81753c3b3f757a24d52f3be522fcc:/doc/todo/require_CAPTCHA_to_edit.mdwn?ds=sidebyside diff --git a/doc/todo/require_CAPTCHA_to_edit.mdwn b/doc/todo/require_CAPTCHA_to_edit.mdwn index 0e32afc65..110b4167f 100644 --- a/doc/todo/require_CAPTCHA_to_edit.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/require_CAPTCHA_to_edit.mdwn @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ I don't necessarily trust all OpenID providers to stop bots. I note that ikiwik I imagine a plugin that modifies the login screen to use . You would then be required to fill in the captcha as well as log in in the normal way. +-- [[users/Will]] + > I hate CAPTCHAs with a passion. Someone else is welcome to write such a > plugin. > @@ -14,6 +16,28 @@ I imagine a plugin that modifies the login screen to use >> Something like the moinmoin global >> list? +>>> OpenID can be thought of as pushing the problem of determining if +>>> someone is a human or a spambot back from the openid consumer to the +>>> openid provider. So, providers that make it possible for spambots to +>>> use their openids, or that are even set up explicitly for use in +>>> spamming, would be the ones to block. Or, providers that are known to +>>> use very good screening for humans would be the ones to allow. +>>> (Openid delegation makes it a bit harder than just looking at the +>>> openid url though.) --[[Joey]] + +>>>> Well, OpenID only addresses authentication issues, not authorisation issues. +>>>> Given that it is trivial to set up your own OpenID provider (a full provider, not +>>>> just a forward to another provider), I can't see a +>>>> blacklist working in the long term (it would be like blacklisting email). +>>>> A whitelist might work (it would not be quite as bad as whitelisting email). In any case, +>>>> there is now a captcha plugin for those that want it. It is accessible +>>>> (there is an audio option) and serves a social purpose along with +>>>> keeping bots out (the captcha is used to help digitise hard to read +>>>> words in books for [Carnegie Mellon University](http://www.cs.cmu.edu/) and +>>>> [The Internet Archive](http://www.archive.org/) ). Finally, because the actual captcha is outsourced +>>>> it means that someone else is taking care of keeping it ahead of +>>>> the bot authors. + Okie - I have a first pass of this. There are still some issues. Currently the code verifies the CAPTCHA. If you get it right then you're fine. @@ -30,7 +54,79 @@ A second issue is that the OpenID login system resets the 'required' flags of all the other fields, so using OpenID will cause the CAPTCHA to be ignored. -> This is still a todo. +> This is still not fixed. I would have thought the following patch would +> have fixed this second issue, but it doesn't. + +(code snipped as a working [[patch]] is below) + +>> What seems to be happing here is that the openid plugin defines a +>> validate hook for openid_url that calls validate(). validate() in turn +>> redirects the user to the openid server for validation, and exits. If +>> the openid plugins' validate hook is called before your recaptcha +>> validator, your code never gets a chance to run. I don't know how to +>> control the other that FormBuilder validates fields, but the only fix I +>> can see is to somehow influence that order. +>> +>> Hmm, maybe you need to move your own validation code out of the validate +>> hook. Instead, just validate the captcha in the formbuilder_setup hook. +>> The problem with this approach is that if validation fails, you can't +>> just flag it as invalid and let formbuilder handle that. Instead, you'd +>> have to hack something in to redisplay the captcha by hand. --[[Joey]] + +>>> Fixed this. I just modified the OpenID plugin to check if the captcha +>>> succeeded or failed. Seeing as the OpenID plugin is the one that is +>>> abusing the normal validate method, I figured it was best to keep +>>> the fix in the same place. I also added a config switch so you can set if +>>> the captcha is needed for OpenID logins. OpenID defaults to ignoring +>>> the captcha. +>>> Patch is inline below. +>>> I think this whole thing is working now. + +>>>> Ok, glad it's working. Not thrilled that it needs to modify the +>>>> openid plugin, especially as I'm not sure if i I will integrate the +>>>> captcha plugin into mainline. Also because it's not very clean to have +>>>> the oprnid plugin aware of another plugin like that. I'd like to +>>>> prusue my idea of not doing the captcha validation in the validate +>>>> hook. + +--- a/IkiWiki/Plugin/openid.pm ++++ b/IkiWiki/Plugin/openid.pm +@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ sub getopt () { #{{{ + error($@) if $@; + Getopt::Long::Configure('pass_through'); + GetOptions("openidsignup=s" => \$config{openidsignup}); ++ GetOptions("openidneedscaptcha=s" => \$config{openidneedscaptcha}); + } #}}} + + sub formbuilder_setup (@) { #{{{ +@@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ sub formbuilder_setup (@) { #{{{ + # Skip all other required fields in this case. + foreach my $field ($form->field) { + next if $field eq "openid_url"; ++ next if $config{openidneedscaptcha} && $field eq "recaptcha"; + $form->field(name => $field, required => 0, + validate => '/.*/'); + } +@@ -96,6 +98,18 @@ sub validate ($$$;$) { #{{{ + } + } + ++ if ($config{openidneedscaptcha} && defined $form->field("recaptcha")) { ++ foreach my $field ($form->field) { ++ next unless ($field eq "recaptcha"); ++ if (! $field->validate) { ++ # if they didn't get the captcha right, ++ # then just claim we validated ok so the ++ # captcha can cause a fail ++ return 1; ++ } ++ } ++ } ++ + my $check_url = $claimed_identity->check_url( + return_to => IkiWiki::cgiurl(do => "postsignin"), + trust_root => $config{cgiurl}, + Instructions ===== @@ -229,4 +325,3 @@ sub check_answer { } 1; -