X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/87ece1837d203ba384c1c565a507558d81c1a840..fc299df955879bf958aa78338ba64d56a7df17a9:/doc/plugins/aggregate/discussion.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/plugins/aggregate/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/aggregate/discussion.mdwn
index f5e44c529..1db6240d5 100644
--- a/doc/plugins/aggregate/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/plugins/aggregate/discussion.mdwn
@@ -57,3 +57,35 @@ New bug: new posts aren't getting displayed (or cached for aggregation). After f
 > Even if you start it more frequently, aggregation will only occur every
 > `updateinterval` minutes (default 15), maximum. Does this explain what
 > you're seeing? --[[Joey]]
+
+>> Crap, right, and my test update has since made it into the planet. His post still hasn't. So it must be something with David's feed again? A quick test with XML::Feed looks like it's parsing just fine: --[[schmonz]]
+
+    $ perl 
+    use XML::Feed;
+    my $feed = XML::Feed->parse(URI->new('http://www.davidj.org/rss.xml')) or die XML::Feed->errstr;
+    print $feed->title, "\n";
+    for my $entry ($feed->entries) {
+    print $entry->title, ": ", $entry->issued, "\n";
+    }
+    ^D
+    davidj.org
+    Amway Stories - Refrigerator Pictures: 2008-09-19T00:12:27
+    Amway Stories - Coffee: 2008-09-13T10:08:17
+    Google Alphabet Update: 2008-09-11T22:55:37
+    Writing for writing's sake: 2008-09-09T23:39:05
+    Google Chrome: 2008-09-02T23:12:26
+    Mister Casual: 2008-07-25T09:01:17
+    Parental Conversations: 2008-07-24T10:44:44
+    Place Of George Orwell: 2008-06-03T22:11:07
+    The Raw Beauty Of A National Duolian: 2008-05-31T12:41:06
+
+> I had no problem getting the "Refrigerator Pictures" post to aggregate
+> here, though without a copy of the old feed I can't be 100% sure I've
+> reproduced your ikiwiki's state. --[[Joey]]
+
+>> Okay, I blew away the cached entries and aggregator state files and reran the aggregator and all appears well again. If the problem recurs I'll be sure to post here. :-) --[[schmonz]]
+
+>>> On the off chance that you retained a copy of the old state, I'd not
+>>> mind having a copy to investigate. --[[Joey]]
+
+>>>> Didn't think of that, will keep a copy if there's a next time. -- [[schmonz]]