X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/8728a79226896b2909f60753dc17978c065cfc57..d1dbd8ea15007b6a569c9d27b04bb18ac22a9547:/doc/todo/inline_raw_files.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/inline_raw_files.mdwn b/doc/todo/inline_raw_files.mdwn index 645ab89b7..52a4be726 100644 --- a/doc/todo/inline_raw_files.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/inline_raw_files.mdwn @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -[[!template id=gitbranch branch=wtk/master author="[[wtk]]"]] +[[!template id=gitbranch branch=wtk/raw_inline author="[[wtk]]"]] summary ======= @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Also raise an error in `IkiWiki::pagetype($file)` if `$file` is blank, which avo I'm using the new code in my [blog][]. -[blog]: http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~wking/unfolding-disasters/posts/yacc2dot/ +[blog]: http://blog.tremily.us/posts/yacc2dot/ usage ===== @@ -28,4 +28,88 @@ usage > So I don't see the point of your patch. Although since your text > editor seems to like to make lots of whitespace changes, it's possible > I missed something in the large quantity of noise introduced by it. -> --[[Joey]] +> --[[Joey]] + +>> As I understand it, setting `raw=yes` causes the page to be inlined +>> as if the page contents had appeared in place of the directive. The +>> content is then processed by whatever `htmlize()` applies to the +>> inlining page. I want the inlined page to be unprocessed, and +>> wrapped in `
...
` (as they are on the blog
+>> post I link to above).
+>>
+>> Enclosures do not include the page contents at all, just a link to
+>> them. I'm trying to inline the content so I can comment on it from
+>> the inlining page.
+>>
+>> Apologies for my cluttered version history, I should have branched my
+>> earlier changes off to make things clearer. I tried to isolate my
+>> whitespace changes (fixes?) in c9ae012d245154c3374d155958fcb0b60fda57ce.
+>> 157389355d01224b2d3c3f6e4c1eb42a20ec8a90 should hold all the content
+>> changes.
+>>
+>> A list of other things globbed into my master branch that should have
+>> been separate branches:
+>>
+>> * Make it easy to select a Markdown executable for mdwn.pm.
+>> * Included an updated form of
+>> [[Javier Rojas' linktoimgonly.pm|forum/link_to_an_image_inside_the_wiki_without_inlining_it]].
+>> * Included an updated form of
+>> [Jason Blevins' mdwn_itex.pm](http://jblevins.org/git/ikiwiki/plugins.git/plain/mdwn_itex.pm).
+>> * Assorted minor documentation changes.
+>>
+>> --[[wtk]]
+
+>>> I haven't heard anything in a while, so I've reorganized my version
+>>> history and rebased it on the current ikiwiki head. Perhaps now it
+>>> will be easier to merge or reject. Note the new branch name:
+>>> `raw_inline`. I'll open separate todo items for items mentioned in my
+>>> previous comment. --[[wtk]]
+
+----
+
+Reviewing your patch the first thing I see is this:
+
+++ if (! $file) { ++ error("Missing file."); ++ } ++ +This fails if the filename is "0". Also, `pagetype()` +currently cannot fail; allowing it to crash the entire +wiki build if the filename is somehow undefined seems +unwise. + +I didn't look much further, because it seems to me what you're trying to do +can be better accomplished by using the highlight plugin. Assuming the raw +file you want to inline and comment on is some source-code-like thing, +which seems likely. + +Or, another way to do it would be to use the templates plugin, and make +a template there that puts an inline directive inside pre tags. + --[[Joey]] [[!tag reviewed]] + +---- + +If `pagetype()` cannot fail, then I suppose that check has to go ;). + +I was under the impression that [[plugins/highlight]] didn't support +inlining code. It looks like it supports highlighing stand-alone +files or embedded code. Perhaps I should extend it to support inlined +code instead of pushing this patch? + +> If you configure highlight to support standalone files, then you can +> inline the resulting pages and get nicely highlighted source code +> inlined into the page. --[[Joey]] + +The `raw.tmpl` included in the patch *does* include the inlined +content inside `pre` tags. The problem is that the current inline +code insists on running `htmlize()` on the content before inserting it +in the template. The heart of my patch is an altered +`get_inline_content()` that makes the `htmlize()` call dependent on a +`$read_raw` flag. If the flag is set, the raw (non-htmlized) content +is used instead. + +I just rebased my patches against the current Ikiwiki trunk (no major +changes) to make them easier to review. + --[[wtk]]