X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/84a9a3cf8a045c6076f5cf08996d88057e8a8a22..8bedf14f338b96250758ab4c58a7d2ef0cf7a2af:/doc/todo/latex.mdwn?ds=inline diff --git a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn index cedf7cbd5..56d3b1c0c 100644 --- a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ How about a plugin adding a -[[preprocessor_directive|preprocessordirective]] to render some given LaTeX +[[preprocessor_directive|ikiwiki/directive]] to render some given LaTeX and include it in the page? This could either render the LaTeX as a PNG via -[[debpkg dvipng]] and include the resulting image in the page, or perhaps +[[!debpkg dvipng]] and include the resulting image in the page, or perhaps render via [HeVeA](http://pauillac.inria.fr/~maranget/hevea/index.html), [TeX2page](http://www.ccs.neu.edu/~dorai/tex2page/tex2page-doc.html), or similar. Useful for mathematics, as well as for stuff like the LaTeX version @@ -167,13 +167,16 @@ Okay, the last version of the tex plugin for ikiwiki can be downloaded [here](ht > fixed a bug (the first time it was run, it tried to write the png file > before the teximages/ directory existed) and checked the result in. > -> Can you please flesh out [[plugins/tex]] with +> Can you please flesh out [[plugins/teximg]] with > whatever documentation people who know tex will expect to see? Okay, I'll fill this up today I think with information about the plugin Done. Is that docu fine with you? +>> Perhaps add some documentation about the kind of tex code that can be +>> used, or a link to some documentation so people who don't know latex +>> well can figure this out? > Also, please review my changes. In particular, I changed the @badthings > array to use qr//, which is much clearer, but it needs to be tested that @@ -194,7 +197,7 @@ This are of course the minority of people (but I guess also the minority of peop > I'm thinking about renameing the preprocessor directive to teximg. -> \[[teximg code="" alt="foo"]] makes sense.. Would it make sense to rename +> \[[!teximg code="" alt="foo"]] makes sense.. Would it make sense to rename > the whole plugin, or do you think that other tex stuff should go in this > same plugin? @@ -213,5 +216,5 @@ Ah yes.. sorry forgot to update the plugin in my public_html folder %-). This wa > > --[[Joey]] -[[tag soc]] -[[tag wishlist]] +[[!tag soc]] +[[!tag wishlist]]