X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/848ff1bf5e218c57cc738a85ed02d7e1396c1d22..3d7147992ab24d953c87b91f75851ca45895073c:/doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn?ds=sidebyside

diff --git a/doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn b/doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn
index 62e91eee4..e3cec4a9b 100644
--- a/doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ would solve my problem. Hmmm? --[[intrigeri]]
 >>> not be broken. I will thus keep the existing `renamepage` as it
 >>> is, and call `rename` the global hook I need. --[[intrigeri]]
 
->>>> Done in my `po` branch. --[[intrigeri]]
+>>>> [[Done]] in my `po` branch. --[[intrigeri]]
 
 I think I see a problem in the rename hook. The hook is called
 before the plugin adds any subpages to the set of pages to rename.
@@ -80,3 +80,36 @@ rename hashes it wants to add. Or, if the ability to modify existing
 hashes is desired, it could return the full set of hashes.
 
 --[[Joey]] 
+
+> I fixed the last part, i.e. a rename hook function now returns the
+> full set of hashes. As I also converted it to take named parameters,
+> such a function still is passed a reference to the original array,
+> though, because one can't build a hash containing an array of hashes
+> as a value, without passing this array as a reference.
+> 
+>> Sure.
+> 
+> I'm not entirely sure about your first concern. Calling the hook
+> before or after the subpages addition both have their own problems.
+> 
+> What about running the hook before *and* after the subpages
+> addition, with an additional `when` named parameter, so that
+> a given hook function can choose to act only before or after, or both?
+> 
+> --[[intrigeri]]
+>> 
+>> Have you thought about making the hook be run once *per* file that is
+>> selected to be renamed? This would even handle the case where two
+>> plugins use the hook; plugin A would see when plugin B adds a new file
+>> to be renamed. And the subpage renaming stuff could probably be moved
+>> into the rename hook too. --[[Joey]] 
+>>>
+>>> I've implemented this nice solution in my po branch, please review.
+>>> I'm slowly coming back to do the last bits needed to get my po and
+>>> meta branch merged.  --[[intrigeri]]
+
+>>>> It looks good. I made some small changes to it in my own po branch.
+>>>> Nothing significant really. If this were not tied up in the po branch,
+>>>> I've have merged it to master already. --[[Joey]] 
+
+>>>> Thanks, this is great :) --[[intrigeri]]