X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/76f39885108f3b95fe1b5bd0b6a89d5c01f9d103..ac5e2b621e01d27e613565da5ab6b9e9d735e73d:/doc/todo/recentchanges.mdwn?ds=sidebyside diff --git a/doc/todo/recentchanges.mdwn b/doc/todo/recentchanges.mdwn index dc5d3611b..d46c0d9a8 100644 --- a/doc/todo/recentchanges.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/recentchanges.mdwn @@ -54,14 +54,35 @@ etc.) Virtual pages would "expire" and be deleted if they were not depended on in some way. Let's say these pages are created in edits/commit_%d.mdwn. RecentChanges -would then be a page which did nothing but inline the last 50 edits/*. +would then be a page which did nothing but inline the last 50 `edits/*`. This would give static generation and RSS/Atom feeds. The inline -plugin could be optionally altered to inline pages from edits/* +plugin could be optionally altered to inline pages from `edits/*` that match any pages in its pagespec, and through this we could get -a recent-changes+pagespec thing. +a recent-changes+pagespec thing. You could also exclude edits that have +"minor" in the commit message (or some other thing that marks them as +unremarkable). You could make an argument that I care way too much about what amounts to edits anyhow, but like Josh says, there are use cases for this. While this could be done with mail subscriptions, I can think of sites where you might want to disable all auth so that people can't edit your pages. --Ethan + +> I really dislike all Wiki engine recentchanges pages. They all tend to be +> fairly machine readable, but confusing for non-wiki users to grok. And I've +> yet to see an _attractive_ recentchanges implementation. IkiWikis' is no +> better or worse than the others. +> +> I really like the frontpage of [Bill +> Seitz](http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/FrontPage) as an recentchanges +> format. Note how he uses some clever css to show changes in different +> sections of the website. I modeled my own +> [recentchanges](http://xtermin.us/recentchanges) page page on his ideas. This +> probably isn't appropriate for non-WikiLog style setups, but is this +> something closer to what you what was requested? +> +> BTW: My recentchanges plugin does not seem to add a lot processing time +> to compiling. Then again, I'm not pulling changelog message from the RCS +> backend. +> +> -- CharlesMauch