X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/72990ac9a0ba773a1a6c064865d5f851e43d115b..acb6f66fbe77e0f331d1e531de67c9a1483c0f26:/doc/todo/latex.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
index 2a29eae1c..01d927552 100644
--- a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 How about a plugin adding a
-[[preprocessor_directive|preprocessordirective]] to render some given LaTeX
+[[preprocessor_directive|ikiwiki/preprocessordirective]] to render some given LaTeX
 and include it in the page?  This could either render the LaTeX as a PNG via
 [[debpkg dvipng]] and include the resulting image in the page, or perhaps
 render via [HeVeA](http://pauillac.inria.fr/~maranget/hevea/index.html),
@@ -167,16 +167,25 @@ Okay, the last version of the tex plugin for ikiwiki can be downloaded [here](ht
 > fixed a bug (the first time it was run, it tried to write the png file
 > before the teximages/ directory existed) and checked the result in.
 > 
-> Can you please flesh out [[plugins/tex]] with
+> Can you please flesh out [[plugins/teximg]] with
 > whatever documentation people who know tex will expect to see?
 
 Okay, I'll fill this up today I think with information about the plugin
 
+Done. Is that docu fine with you?
+
+>> Perhaps add some documentation about the kind of tex code that can be
+>> used, or a link to some documentation so people who don't know latex
+>> well can figure this out?
 
 > Also, please review my changes. In particular, I changed the @badthings
 > array to use qr//, which is much clearer, but it needs to be tested that
 > I didn't break the checking code when I did it. It would be nice to write
 > a test case that tries to feed it bad code and makes sure it rejects it.
+
+I'll test this now on my server. I'll report here later.
+Okay, checked. it works fine. My blacklist tests were successfull.
+
 >
 > Does it really make sense to have an alt tag for the image
 > that contains the tex code? Will that make any sense when browsing
@@ -192,7 +201,8 @@ This are of course the minority of people (but I guess also the minority of peop
 > the whole plugin, or do you think that other tex stuff should go in this
 > same plugin?
 
-I'll think over this until I'm at work ;)
+I'll think over this until I'm at work ;) Only for rendering images... not for generating .tex files .../wiki/
+the name is all the same i think. If you like teximg better than switch :)
 
 
 > Note: I removed the style= attribute, since as I've told you, the