X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/6988e1460c7da8db853ceba4c61575b34724f32f..04498cdeb486a518ef9ed2464cb95f734b48c6bd:/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn b/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn
index a361ae965..6fccc5c86 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/markdown_bug:_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses.mdwn
@@ -8,4 +8,30 @@ compare:
 
 It seems putting a '+' in there throws it. Maybe it's a markdown bug, or maybe the obfuscation markdown applies to email-links is being caught by the HTML sanitizer.
 
- -- [[JonDowland]]
+ -- [[users/Jon]]
+
+> It's a markdown bug. For some reason, markdown doesn't recognize the email with a '+' as an email:
+>
+>     $ echo '<a+b@c.org>' | markdown
+>     <p><a+b@c.org></p>
+>
+> htmlscrubber then (rightly) removes this unknown tag.
+>
+
+>> Filed [in CPAN](http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=37909)
+>> --[[Joey]] [[!tag done]]
+
+> But I've noticed some other Text::Markdown bugs that, even with htmlscrubber, produce
+> [ill-formed (X)HTML](http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fikiwiki.info%2Fbugs%2Fmarkdown_bug%3A_email_escaping_and_plus_addresses%2F).
+> (View the markdown source of this page.)
+>
+> --Gabriel
+
+>> The htmlscrubber does not attempt to produce valid html from invalid. It
+>> attempts to prevent exploits in html. The tidy plugin can force html to
+>> valid. --[[Joey]]
+
+<tt>
+
+- 
+>