X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/67ba074ba8809a2f849ee51770e3d4695311647c..3bb00d142a4d31316fc6f0eb1277aa2fafe4dbe9:/doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn?ds=inline diff --git a/doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn b/doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn index c5b2b1096..e3cec4a9b 100644 --- a/doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn @@ -60,3 +60,56 @@ would solve my problem. Hmmm? --[[intrigeri]] >>> merge such a change, as the 3.x plugin API is released and should >>> not be broken. I will thus keep the existing `renamepage` as it >>> is, and call `rename` the global hook I need. --[[intrigeri]] + +>>>> [[Done]] in my `po` branch. --[[intrigeri]] + +I think I see a problem in the rename hook. The hook is called +before the plugin adds any subpages to the set of pages to rename. +So, if the user choses to rename subpages, po will not notice +they are moving, and will not move their po files. + +Perhaps the hooks should be moved to come after subpages are added. +This would, though, mean that if the hook somehow decides to add +entirely other pages to the list, their subpages would not be +automatically added. + +I also have some qualms about the design of the hook. In particular, +passing the mutable array reference probably makes it impossible +to use from external plugins. Instead it could return any additional +rename hashes it wants to add. Or, if the ability to modify existing +hashes is desired, it could return the full set of hashes. + +--[[Joey]] + +> I fixed the last part, i.e. a rename hook function now returns the +> full set of hashes. As I also converted it to take named parameters, +> such a function still is passed a reference to the original array, +> though, because one can't build a hash containing an array of hashes +> as a value, without passing this array as a reference. +> +>> Sure. +> +> I'm not entirely sure about your first concern. Calling the hook +> before or after the subpages addition both have their own problems. +> +> What about running the hook before *and* after the subpages +> addition, with an additional `when` named parameter, so that +> a given hook function can choose to act only before or after, or both? +> +> --[[intrigeri]] +>> +>> Have you thought about making the hook be run once *per* file that is +>> selected to be renamed? This would even handle the case where two +>> plugins use the hook; plugin A would see when plugin B adds a new file +>> to be renamed. And the subpage renaming stuff could probably be moved +>> into the rename hook too. --[[Joey]] +>>> +>>> I've implemented this nice solution in my po branch, please review. +>>> I'm slowly coming back to do the last bits needed to get my po and +>>> meta branch merged. --[[intrigeri]] + +>>>> It looks good. I made some small changes to it in my own po branch. +>>>> Nothing significant really. If this were not tied up in the po branch, +>>>> I've have merged it to master already. --[[Joey]] + +>>>> Thanks, this is great :) --[[intrigeri]]