X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/669a5f5ecc0d50daf96d8dc2af219c94c8625fb4..d5fb38bd0f7110f6b7ec3779ba5df922ba7e69e3:/doc/todo/Protocol_relative_urls_for_stylesheet_linking.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/Protocol_relative_urls_for_stylesheet_linking.mdwn b/doc/todo/Protocol_relative_urls_for_stylesheet_linking.mdwn index ccbaf4e73..307c528ca 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Protocol_relative_urls_for_stylesheet_linking.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Protocol_relative_urls_for_stylesheet_linking.mdwn @@ -20,12 +20,27 @@ but this breaks all sorts of things, like the 404 plugin and wiki rebuilds will > CGI-generated pages should generate those links. This was the implementation of > [[todo/want_to_avoid_ikiwiki_using_http_or_https_in_urls_to_allow_serving_both]]. > +>> This wasn't actually the case if the schemes are different; but now +>> IkiWiki will generate protocol-relative URLs if the CGI is https, +>> the url is http and the hostname is the same (i.e. it assumes that the https +>> equivalent of the url will also work). This is to prevent mixed-content +>> issues, and partially addresses this todo item. +>> --[[smcv]] +> > If your`$config{url}` and `$config{cgiurl}` have different hostnames (e.g. > `url => "http://wiki.example.com", cgiurl => "http://cgi.example.com/ikiwiki.cgi"`) > then you might still have this problem. In principle, IkiWiki could generate > protocol-relative URLs in this situation, but it isn't clear to me how > widely-supported those are. > +>> HTML5 says protocol-relative URLs work, and they seem to be widely +>> supported in practice, so I've changed the rule to: if the url and cgiurl +>> share a scheme (protocol) but differ only by hostname, use `//foo/bar` +>> protocol-relative URLs. This partially addresses this todo. +>> I'm still thinking about what the right thing is for more complicated +>> situations: see [[todo/design for cross-linking between content and CGI]]. +>> --[[smcv]] +> > If you set both the `$config{url}` and `$config{cgiurl}` to https, but make > the resulting HTML available over HTTP as well as HTTPS, that should work > fine - accesses will be over http until the user either explicitly