X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/613a54a3cb48ff0bd00c02d44304ce08b6725343..4d166acccbd9c46b92bbda93a5e0876d4619afab:/doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn?ds=sidebyside

diff --git a/doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn
index 59740ec37..3d7452b9a 100644
--- a/doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn
@@ -60,9 +60,12 @@ spam problems. So, use `check_canedit` as at least a first-level check?
 > have postcomment(blog/*) or something. (Perhaps instead of taking a glob, postcomment
 > should take a pagespec, so you can have postcomment(link(tags/commentable))?)
 >
-> This is why `anonok_pages => 'postcomment(*)'` and `locked_pages => '!postcomment(*)'`
+> This is why `anonok_pagespec => 'postcomment(*)'` and `locked_pages => '!postcomment(*)'`
 > are necessary to allow anonymous and logged-in editing (respectively).
 >
+>> I changed that to move the flag out of the page name, and into a variable that the `match_postcomment`
+>> function checks for. Other ugliness still applies. :-) --[[Joey]] 
+>
 > This is ugly - one alternative would be to add `check_permission()` that takes a
 > page and a verb (create, edit, rename, remove and maybe comment are the ones I
 > can think of so far), use that, and port the plugins you mentioned to use that