X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/544d48328b0b6ccc5a1ae6d74901b4819630537e..f096a9d7986025badd2f2773bbf71fb33cb96b7b:/doc/bugs/disabling_backlinks.mdwn?ds=sidebyside

diff --git a/doc/bugs/disabling_backlinks.mdwn b/doc/bugs/disabling_backlinks.mdwn
index 0a1963bc3..ba96a4e2b 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/disabling_backlinks.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/disabling_backlinks.mdwn
@@ -10,4 +10,21 @@ My first reading (and second and third) of this was that backlinks would be disa
 --[[KarlMW]]
 
 > Yes, it only controls the number of backlinks that are shown at the
-> bottom of the page vs how many are moved to the popup --[[Joey]]
+> bottom of the page vs how many are moved to the popup. I've tried to
+> improve the documentation for this. [[done]] --[[Joey]]
+
+
+I notice that there is quite a bit of redundancy when both tags and
+backlinks are used extensively. On most pages, the set of links features in
+both categories is almost identical because a tag's index page is shown
+both as a tag link and as a backlink. Is there a way to improve that
+situation somehow? I realise that backlinks aren't generated when the tag
+index page refers to its contents by \[\[!map ...]], etc., but sometimes an
+auto-generated index is insufficient.
+
+ --Peter
+
+> Um, if you're manually linking from the tag's page to each page so
+> tagged, I think you have larger problems than tags and backlinks being
+> the same. Like keeping that list of links up to date as tags are added
+> and changed. --[[Joey]]