X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/534797d71997be4f37bf4946e7e8c351ea0d9706..651cdd4b2a85f4e5f9d298a7eea7d0e6d94442b1:/doc/todo/support_multi-row_table_headers.mdwn?ds=sidebyside

diff --git a/doc/todo/support_multi-row_table_headers.mdwn b/doc/todo/support_multi-row_table_headers.mdwn
index 2b22d5d3e..11bb909e2 100644
--- a/doc/todo/support_multi-row_table_headers.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/support_multi-row_table_headers.mdwn
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
 [[!template id=gitbranch branch=jon/table_headerblock author="[[Jon]]"]]
+[[!tag reviewed]]
+
 It would be great if it were possible to support multi-row table headers in the [[plugins/table]] plugin, so you could do e.g.
 
         \[[!table header="""
@@ -13,7 +15,13 @@ It would be great if it were possible to support multi-row table headers in the
 [[!tag wishlist patch]]
 
 > This seems like weird overloading of the header parameter - it's
-> table data, except when it isn't. Perhaps
+> table data, except when it isn't.
+
+> > My first cut (now rebased out of existence I think) introduced a
+> > new "headerblock" parameter, but trying to clearly document the
+> > interaction of data/headerblock/header parameters was too awkward. -- [[Jon]]
+
+> Perhaps
 > something like this would be easier to use in practice?
 > (and also more featureful :-) )
 >
@@ -23,7 +31,17 @@ It would be great if it were possible to support multi-row table headers in the
 >     ikiwiki | no | yes | yes
 >     Starcraft | yes | yes | via Wine
 >     """]]
->
+
+> > Thanks for your prompt feedback!
+> > 
+> > This would probably be good, yes, and having mixed row/column headers is
+> > definitely a nice-to-have. I don't relish the prospect of writing the parser
+> > but I see you've made a stab already...
+> > 
+> > One thing you'd lose, but it's debatable whether this is valuable, would be
+> > to have the header defined in the directive, and the remaining table data
+> > declared in an external CSV. -- [[Jon]]
+
 > intended to be rendered like
 >
 > <table>
@@ -56,3 +74,57 @@ It would be great if it were possible to support multi-row table headers in the
 > `header="1 row, first 2 cols, last column"`.
 >
 > --[[smcv]]
+
+> > To be clear I think your suggestion is a good one, but my hack has
+> > addressed my immediate need so it's the one I'm deploying at $ork for the
+> > time being. I'm unlikely to have time to implement this solution in the
+> > near future. -- [[Jon]]
+
+----
+
+I'd quite like to revisit this if that's ok. I'm still carrying a fork of
+table.pm locally to add this feature as I find it so useful. The main objection
+you made back in 2014 seems to be overloading the header= parameter, and I agree
+that this is not ideal. So I'm happy to resubmit this with an alternative parameter
+name for the new purpose. But I balked at the idea of implementing something like 
+an NLP processor to define the header range. And I must stress how useful it is in
+practise to separate out the header definition from the data: quite often I don't
+want headers in my CSV files at all, for example, so I can perform rudimentary analysis
+on them with command line tools without having to factor in a header line (how many
+records?  = `wc -l`; sorting on fields simply with `sort -k` etc.). Having them
+separate means I can have machine-generated or manipulated CSV files of data and then
+use ikiwiki to mark them up for human reading, but change or regenerate the data quickly
+and easily underneath.
+
+I'd appreciate your take on the above suggestions [[smcv]] before I roll my sleeves up.
+Thanks! — [[Jon]] (2018-09-24)
+
+> I continue to think that the `header` parameter shouldn't be sometimes a
+> description of which parts of the table are header, and sometimes the header
+> data itself; so if you want an inline header, it should indeed have a
+> distinct name.
+>
+> If you can think of a good name for the new parameter, and can document it
+> reasonably clearly, then I would be OK with having a separate parameter that
+> is the externally-provided header. I don't know what the right name for that
+> parameter would be: `headercontent` or `headerblock` is unwieldy but I can't
+> think of anything better.
+>
+> It would maybe simplify things to make it mutually exclusive with `header`,
+> but then you wouldn't be able to express things like "the first column of my
+> CSV is a header, the first row is just an ordinary row, and please add
+> this literal header row to the top".
+>
+> It might help to write the documentation and/or tests first, and then
+> implement it afterwards, when you have an "API" you're happy with.
+>
+> Corner cases:
+>
+> How would it work if you want to add a literal header column on the left
+> rather than adding a literal header row on the top? If you add both, what
+> happens at the top left corner?
+>
+> Is it necessary to be able to add header columns on the right (for RTL
+> languages?), or header rows (footer rows, I suppose) on the bottom?
+>
+> --[[smcv]]