X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/4f37413050d4c17cb428820991541595e4645c66..61a36de432c58a8d7703b1ecc5d5704981e10e2d:/doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn b/doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn index 4468ce1e9..ca7b282fa 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn @@ -77,6 +77,28 @@ but disruptive since all .rst depend on it). Well, the customizations have to be picked and chosen from this, but at least the global python file can be very convenient. +> Did you consider just including the global rst header text into an item +> in the setup file? --[[Joey]] +> +>> Then `rst_header` would not be much different from the python script +>> `rst_customize`. rst_header is as safe as other files (though disruptive +>> as noted), so it should/could be a editable file in the Wiki. A Python +>> script of course can not be. There is nothing you can do in the +>> rst_header (that you sensibly would do, I think) that couldn't be done in +>> the Python script. `rst_header` has very limited use, but it is another +>> possibility, mainly for the user-editable aspect. --[[ulrik]] +>> +>> (I foresaw only two things to be added to the rst_header: the default +>> role could be configured there (as with rst_wikirole), and if you have a +>> meta-role like :shortcut:, shortcuts could be defined there.) +> +> I have some discussion on the [docutils mailing list][dml], the developers +> of docutils seems to favor "Proposal 1", while I defend my ideas. They +> want all users of ReST to use only the basic featureset to remain +> compatible, of course. -- [[ulrik]] + +[dml]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.text.docutils.user/5376 + Some rst-custom [examples are here](http://kaizer.se/wiki/rst_examples/) [rst-custom]: http://github.com/engla/ikiwiki/commits/rst-customize @@ -141,9 +163,23 @@ picture before it. >> use more rst-like syntax (and documents degrades better outside the wiki as >> noted). >> ->> The named link syntax (just like the :wiki: role) are inspired from trac ->> and a good fit, but only if the wiki is committed to using only rst, ->> which I don't think is the case. +>>> Unsure about the degredation argument. It will work some of +>>> the time, but ikiwiki's [[ikiwiki/subpage/linkingrules]] +>>> are sufficiently different from normal html relative link +>>> rules that it often won't work. --[[Joey]] +>>> +>>>> With degradation I mean that if you take a file out of the wiki; the +>>>> links degrade to stylized text. If using default role, they degrade to +>>>> :title: which renders italicized text (which I find is exactly +>>>> appropriate). There is no way for them to degrade into links, except of +>>>> course if you reimplement the :wiki: role. You can also respecify +>>>> either the default role (the `wikilink` syntax) or the :wiki: role (the +>>>> :wiki:`wikilink` syntax) to any other markup, for example None. +>>>> --[[ulrik]] +>> +>> The named link syntax (just like the :wiki: role) are inspired from +>> [trac][tracrst] and a good fit, but only if the wiki is committed to +>> using only rst, which I don't think is the case. >> >> The rst-customize changes are very useful for custom directive >> installations (like the sourcecode directive, or shortcut roles I show @@ -165,9 +201,11 @@ picture before it. >> other phases? rst must be before any preprocess hook to avoid seeing any >> HTML. >> ->> With the presented changes, I already have a working RestructuredText ->> wiki, but I'm admitting that using .. raw:: html around all directives is ->> very ugly (I use few directives: inline, toggle, meta, tag, map) +>>> One of my long term goals is to refactor all the code in ikiwiki +>>> that manually runs the various stages of the render pipeline, +>>> into one centralized place. Once that's done, that place can get +>>> smart about what order to run the stages, and use a different +>>> order for rst. --[[Joey]] >> >> If I'm thinking right, processing to HTML already in filter means any >> processing in scan can be reused directly (or skipped if it's legal to @@ -175,6 +213,14 @@ picture before it. >> >> -- [[ulrik]] +>>> Seems it could be, yes. --[[Joey]] +>>> +>>>> It is not clear how we can work around reST wrapping directives with +>>>> paragraph tags. Also, some escaping of xml characters & <> might +>>>> happen, but I can't imagine right now what breakage can come from that. +>>>> -- [[ulrik]] + +[tracrst]: http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/WikiRestructuredText ### Implementation ### @@ -215,10 +261,27 @@ Perl I've ever written!_) >> Well, no idea how that would be expressed, but I mean, replace the indent >> directly in $handle's return value. >> +>>> Yes, in effect just `indent($1, handle->($2,$,4))` --[[Joey]] +>> >> The indent-catching regex is wrong in the way you mention, it has been >> nagigng my mind a bit as well; I think matching start of line + spaces >> and tabs is the only thing we want. >> -- [[ulrik]] +>> +>>> Well, seems you want to match the indent at the start of the line containing +>>> the directive, even if the directive does not start the line. That would +>>> be quite hard to make a regexp do, though. --[[Joey]] +>> +>> I wasted a long time getting the simpler `indent($1, handle->($2,$,4))` to +>> work (remember, I don't know perl at all). Somehow `$1` does not arrive, I +>> made a simple testcase that worked, and I conclude something inside $handle +>> results in the value of $1 not arriving as it should! +>> +>> Anyway, instead a very simple incremental patch is in [pproc-indent][ppi] +>> where the indentation regex is `(^[ \t]+|)` instead, which seems to work +>> very well (and the regex is multiline now as well). I'm happy to rebase the +>> changes if you want or you can just squash the four patches 1+3 => 1+1 +>> -- [[ulrik]] [ppi]: http://github.com/engla/ikiwiki/commits/pproc-indent