X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/4eb10da4a5af0dfc2c5d02bf8e8b568f2c76bb43..beaa665a9aa20ec266bf7011da326ea95e869457:/doc/todo/Short_wikilinks.mdwn?ds=inline diff --git a/doc/todo/Short_wikilinks.mdwn b/doc/todo/Short_wikilinks.mdwn index 077cded23..05f894dfe 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Short_wikilinks.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Short_wikilinks.mdwn @@ -63,3 +63,42 @@ Other alternatives would be \[[link bar=VeryLongPageName]] >> This is, however, still missing specifying the link text, and adding that option would seem to me to complicate the plugin syntax a lot, unless support is added for the |-syntax for specifying a particular parameter to every plugin. + +>>> Well, the link text in my example above is "bar". It's true that if +>>> you want to use the same link text for multiple distinct links, or +>>> different link texts for the same link, this is missing a useful layer of +>>> indirection; it's optimised for the (probably) more common case. It +>>> could be done as a degenerate form of the syntax I propose below, BTW. +>>> --[[Joey]] + +>> ... Returning to this, the syntax infact wouldn't be so bad with the |-syntax, given a short name for the plugin: + + [[whatever|ref 1]] + \[[ref 1=page_with_long_name]] + +>>> A way to do this that doesn't need hacking at the preprocessor syntax +>>> follows: --[[Joey]] + + \[[link bar=1]] + \[[dest 1=page_with_long_name]] + +>>>> But this doesn't work so well for links that aren't valid keys. Such +>>>> as stuff with spaces in it. I'd like to be able to write any kind of +>>>> links conveniently, not just something that looks like a wikilink. + +>>>>> You're right, and to fix that it could be turned around: --[[Joey]] + + \[[link 1=bar]] + \[[dest 1=page_with_long_name]] + +>> It also shouldn't be difficult to support non-wiki links in this same +>> way, so that you could still link everywhere in an uniform manner, as +>> the (still preferred by me) HTML processing approach would provide. +>> Perhaps a plugin call wouldn't even be necessary for the links +>> themselves: what about aliases for the normal link mechanism? Although +>> the 'ref' call may infact be cleaner, and adding that |-syntax for +>> plugins could offer other possibilities for other plugins. + +>>> I agree, it should be easy to make it support non-wiki links too. +>>> We seem to have converged at something we can both live with that's +>>> reasonable to implement.. --[[Joey]]