X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/4db8792c5bed016371eaf19c74ec599588e29f7b..f5a1550441a9d58652d93deacc333f143a7ecfbd:/doc/todo/wikiwyg/discussion.mdwn?ds=sidebyside diff --git a/doc/todo/wikiwyg/discussion.mdwn b/doc/todo/wikiwyg/discussion.mdwn index e14fbf498..11c96a8b5 100644 --- a/doc/todo/wikiwyg/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/wikiwyg/discussion.mdwn @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ A few observations, in approximate order of priority: wikiwyg.tmpl out to a separate .js file to save space in the rendered pages. * Done. -* Both this plugin and the [[Gallery_Plugin_for_Ikiwiki]] are turning out +* Both this plugin and the [[Gallery]] are turning out to need to add a bunch of pages to the basewiki. I wonder what would be a good way to do this, without bloating the basewiki when the plugins arn't used. Perhaps the underlaydir concept needs to be expanded so it's a set @@ -50,4 +50,132 @@ A few observations, in approximate order of priority: --[[Joey]] -[Javascript Compression]: http://javascriptcompressor.com/ \ No newline at end of file +Oh, by the way, let me know if I forgot to tarball anything. --[[TaylorKillian]] + +[Javascript Compression]: http://javascriptcompressor.com/ + +--- + +Some more comments, on version 1.6. You seem to be making nice progress. + +changes.diff: + +* I don't really like the tarball approach. Doesn't feel like the right + approach somehow. A list of underlay directories feels to me like a + better approach. One reason is that it's more general than a tarball tied + to a given plugin. A list of underlay directories could also be used to + prefer a translated underlay, and use the english version of untranslated + pages, for example. + * I don't quite get what you want to do with the underlay directory, it sounds like + you have something pretty specific in mind. I can talk to you about that more + on IRC later(assuming my internet is working right). + * Basically the idea is to change `$config{underlaydir}` to an array.. + Ok, take a look at the new `add_underlay()` function. You can now just + `add_underlay("wikiwyg")` and it'll look in + /usr/share/ikiwiki/wikiwyg/ for the files. +* When is the WIKIWYG variable in misc.tmpl used? + * The WIKIWYG variable in misc.tmpl is used for the edit page. I believe that is what + you wanted me to do (Check Revision 3840). + * Ah, right. +* Could you move the code that handles saving a page of the page into the + plugin? I just added an editcontent hook, which should allow you to do + that. + * Alright, np. +* Your patch exports run_hooks, but I don't see the plugin using that. + * Yeah, that was from an earlier revision of my plugin, I just forgot to remove that. +* I don't know about exporting pagetitle. So far, only the inline plugin + needs to use that function, I generally only export things after it's + clear a lot of plugins will need them. + * Just looked through the inline plugin. So if I want to use pagetitle in my code, + I have to use the IkiWiki package instead of IkiWiki::Plugin::Wikiwyg? Or would a + better approach be to just copy that function into the Wikiwyg plugin? + * You can just call `IkiWiki::pagetitle()`. + > Note: pagetitle is now exported. + +wikiwyg.tar.gz + +* Would it be possible to provide a diff between wikiwyg upstream and any + modifications you made to its files? I'm not sure which version you used, + so I'm seeing changes in diffing that I'm unsure if you made.. + * , also emailed them to you + in case my internet goes down. + * Could you redo that with diff -u plz? + * Link is updated +* If the files aren't modified, would it be better for users to get them + from the wikiwgy upstream, instead of including them in the plugin? (If so, + they'd go in their own Debian package..) + * The files *are* modified, but I doubt it will make a difference. There have + been no updates to Wikiwyg since 5/30/07 so I'm pretty sure it's unmaintained + now. Showdown is the same case, they haven't changed anything since SoC began. + I could separate them diff's though if you feel it is worth it. + * Well, from a packaging perspective, the question is whether some + other package might want to use the wikiwyg/showdown javascript + files. And whether your mods might break that. If the answers to + these questions are yes and no, then it would make sense to package + them as standalone packages rather than embedding them in ikiwiki. + +misc: + +* What are your thoughts on handling plugins? Just make preview do a + server-side callback? + * That is an option, however I was trying to avoid that due to bandwidth, cpu time + concerns (Two reasons I really like IkiWiki). I was planning on just manually + implementing some of the easier ones (such as img), however I'm still trying to + think of a way for the more complex ones. + * It just seems like it would never be able to support everything, + and would mean reimplementing stuff in javscript and would constantly + need to be kept up to date. Ikiwiki's preview is actually pretty + fast, the only real overhead being the cgi call. +* How do I configure it to only support whole-page editing with wikiwyg and + not insert the javascript into html pages? + * There currently is no option to do that, however it is a 2 line change that I'll work + on after I finish typing this. +* When editing a whole page with wikiwyg, I think it would be good to keep + the save, preview, cancel buttons at the bottom like they are in a + regular page edit. Also the comments box. Kind of a least suprise thing, so that enabling + wikiwyg for whole-page editing basically just changes how the edit box + behaves and keeps the rest of the behavior the same. And I think the preview + button should show a preview rendered server-side, like with a regular edit, + since such a preview is able to support all plugins. + * That's probably a good idea ;) + +Everything else looks fine and ready for merging. If, that is, you think +I should include the plugin with all of its java code in ikiwiki. Thoughts? + +--[[Joey]] + +I'll start working on the changes... Let me know if you find anything else +that needs to be changed. I'd be honored to have my code merged with IkiWiki :) + +--[[TaylorKillian]] + +I wonder if you've had a chance to make any of the remaining changes above? +Even just some of the smaller changes would be much easier for you to +do than for me, and it would be nice to get them sorted out before I +merge it into ikiwiki. --[[Joey] + +None of the links for the WYSIWYG editor work anymore. Does anyone have an up to date link? +Thanks, [[Greg]] + +> There's a branch in [[git]] for the wikiwyg stuff, which includes +> the latest version I sucked in from TaylorKillian's svn repository before +> it went offline. Disapponted that nothing seems to be moving here. +> --[[Joey]] + +>> How far from ready did this seem to be at that point? I find it a bit unclear +>> in the above discussion what was completed and what remained. Also, to recover the +>> wikiwyg-specific stuff from git, it looks like I'd need to ask git for +>> a diff between the wikiwyg branch and its branch point; is there a nice way to do +>> that with gitweb, or would I need to install a full-fledged git client? --Chapman Flack + +>>> I think that the largest missing thing was support for using ikiwiki +>>> to render page previews. +>>> +>>> Erm.. I seem to have screwed up the creation or pushing out of the +>>> wikiwyg branch. It doesn't seem to have any of the wikiwyg changes in +>>> it, and at this point, I don't know where to find them anymore! Damn, +>>> damn, damn. I suspect I did that right when I was learning git, and +>>> screwed up pushing the branch. :-( --[[Joey]] +>>>> Seems the new place is now at Github: +>>>> FYI +>>>> --[[users/Olea]]