X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/4457c6d570daa85c9c2f663b9a8726d3e78f46b8..c3198e519388044894515565ee27f11614287bd1:/doc/todo/support_multi-row_table_headers.mdwn?ds=sidebyside diff --git a/doc/todo/support_multi-row_table_headers.mdwn b/doc/todo/support_multi-row_table_headers.mdwn index 1d418a41b..11bb909e2 100644 --- a/doc/todo/support_multi-row_table_headers.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/support_multi-row_table_headers.mdwn @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@ [[!template id=gitbranch branch=jon/table_headerblock author="[[Jon]]"]] +[[!tag reviewed]] + It would be great if it were possible to support multi-row table headers in the [[plugins/table]] plugin, so you could do e.g. \[[!table header=""" @@ -96,3 +98,33 @@ and easily underneath. I'd appreciate your take on the above suggestions [[smcv]] before I roll my sleeves up. Thanks! — [[Jon]] (2018-09-24) + +> I continue to think that the `header` parameter shouldn't be sometimes a +> description of which parts of the table are header, and sometimes the header +> data itself; so if you want an inline header, it should indeed have a +> distinct name. +> +> If you can think of a good name for the new parameter, and can document it +> reasonably clearly, then I would be OK with having a separate parameter that +> is the externally-provided header. I don't know what the right name for that +> parameter would be: `headercontent` or `headerblock` is unwieldy but I can't +> think of anything better. +> +> It would maybe simplify things to make it mutually exclusive with `header`, +> but then you wouldn't be able to express things like "the first column of my +> CSV is a header, the first row is just an ordinary row, and please add +> this literal header row to the top". +> +> It might help to write the documentation and/or tests first, and then +> implement it afterwards, when you have an "API" you're happy with. +> +> Corner cases: +> +> How would it work if you want to add a literal header column on the left +> rather than adding a literal header row on the top? If you add both, what +> happens at the top left corner? +> +> Is it necessary to be able to add header columns on the right (for RTL +> languages?), or header rows (footer rows, I suppose) on the bottom? +> +> --[[smcv]]