X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/2c05a34be17c805d929f0ad563acf857eba1d46b..9d5c9ce258299c4b495dfa11e652ee06df02053a:/doc/todo/Moving_Pages.mdwn?ds=inline

diff --git a/doc/todo/Moving_Pages.mdwn b/doc/todo/Moving_Pages.mdwn
index 38a5d3ad2..d93cea0a0 100644
--- a/doc/todo/Moving_Pages.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/Moving_Pages.mdwn
@@ -30,14 +30,14 @@ Brad
 >
 > This could also be implemented using a combination of raw inline and meta
 > to change the title (add a "redirected from etc." page. This could be done
-> with a plugin. A redirect page would be [[redirect page="newpage"]].
+> with a plugin. A redirect page would be [[!redirect page="newpage"]].
 > But then if you click "edit" on this redirect page, you won't be able
 > to edit the new page, only the call to redirect.
 > --Ethan
 
 -----
 
-[[tag patch]]
+[[!tag patch]]
 
 This is my second cut at a feature like that requested here.
 It can also be found [here](http://ikidev.betacantrips.com/patches/move.patch).
@@ -361,6 +361,9 @@ It won't be possible to put it on the action bar or somewhere else. (It
 would be possible to code up a different rename button that doesn't do
 that, and use it elsewhere.)
 
+Hmm, unless it saves the edit state and reloads it later, while using a separate
+form. Which seems to solve other problems, so I think is the way to go.
+
 ## SubPages
 
 When renaming `foo`, it probably makes sense to also rename
@@ -392,16 +395,10 @@ is checked too.
 
 ## RCS
 
-Two new optional functions are added to the RCS interface:
-
-* `rcs_delete(file, message, rcstoken, user, ipaddr)`
-* `rcs_rename(old, new, message, rcstoken, user, ipaddr)`
-
-The page move/rename code will check if these are not available, and error
-out.
+Two new functions are added to the RCS interface:
 
-Similar to `rcs_commit` both of these take a rcstoken, which is generated
-by an earlier `rcs_prepedit`.
+* `rcs_remove(file)`
+* `rcs_rename(old, new)`
 
 ## conflicts
 
@@ -410,17 +407,26 @@ Cases that have to be dealt with:
 * Alice clicks "delete" button for a page; Bob makes a modification;
   Alice confirms deletion. Ideally in this case, Alice should get an error
   message that there's a conflict.
+  Update: In my current code, alice's deletion will fail if the file was
+  moved or deleted in the meantime; if the file was modified since alice
+  clicked on the delete button, the modifications will be deleted too. I
+  think this is acceptable.
 * Alice opens edit UI for a page; Bob makes a modification; Alice
   clicks delete button and confirms deletion. Again here, Alice should get
   a conflict error. Note that this means that the rcstoken should be
   recorded when the edit UI is first opened, not when the delete button is
   hit.
+  Update: Again here, there's no conflict, but the delete succeeds. Again,
+  basically acceptible.
 * Alice and Bob both try to delete a page at the same time. It's fine for
   the second one to get a message that it no longer exists. Or just to
   silently fail to delete the deleted page..
+  Update: It will display an error to the second one that the page doesn't
+  exist.
 * Alice deletes a page; Bob had edit window open for it, and saves
   it afterwards. I think that Bob should win in this case; Alice can always
   notice the page has been added back, and delete it again.
+  Update: Bob wins.
 * Alice clicks "rename" button for a page; Bob makes a modification;
   Alice confirms rename. This case seems easy, it should just rename the
   modified page.