X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/2829486a817a002b3b1a2d6df1e635e3ccce0f69..6790e1804b66fb6623406ff33050db12412337f7:/doc/themes/discussion.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/themes/discussion.mdwn b/doc/themes/discussion.mdwn
index d7bd8d627..1c0dd91ec 100644
--- a/doc/themes/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/themes/discussion.mdwn
@@ -21,6 +21,26 @@ links to the actual theme. -- [[anarcat]]
 
 >> Would you reconsider? I've made [[this bootstrap theme|/forum/bootstrap_theme]] that works within the theme plugin without changing the `templatedir` configuration option. It seems that the `page.tmpl` I have in the subfolder `templates` takes precedence. Not sure what you meant by "two versions of page.tmpl", though. -- [[desci]]
 
+>>> The reason we don't want individual themes shipped with ikiwiki
+>>> to have to include their own `page.tmpl` is that when we add new
+>>> features (such as new plugins) to the ikiwiki core, if those features
+>>> require a `page.tmpl` change, we don't want to have to add them to
+>>> multiple variations of `page.tmpl`. This would either lead to
+>>> increased maintenance work (repeating ourselves), or theme-dependent
+>>> feature availability like what happens in Wordpress (for instance
+>>> imagine if `osm` only worked with Bootstrap and `sidebar` only worked
+>>> with Actiontabs - you wouldn't be able to have both).
+>>>
+>>> If you maintain your own local theme, you're welcome to maintain a
+>>> version of `page.tmpl` containing only the features you personally
+>>> need, but the `page.tmpl` in ikiwiki should be comprehensive. --[[smcv]]
+
+>>>> I've tried to make the least changes possible in [this page.tmpl file](https://notabug.org/iikb/ikiwiki-theme-bootstrap/raw/master/templates/page.tmpl), but I couldn't overcome the suckness of bootstrap itself.
+>>>> I am aware of alternatives to bootstrap, but it seems that every one of them would require some changes in the `page.tmpl` to work as expected.
+>>>> I think it is realistic to have a bootstrap (or other superb, fantastic css frame*lazy*work) without a `page.tmpl`,
+>>>> but I also think there should be other way around the chaos of each and every [[available theme|theme_market]] having it's own installing proccess.
+>>>> Other argument I have is: could we have a theme-contrib, like the [[plugins]] have? This would require the mantainer to implement the new features in their themes.
+
 ---
 
 I have a question.