X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/2587137775ab7c0582768e9006b65187d09cb7c4..9b6e3331705badfe0f40265261043b9cdd51820e:/doc/todo/wikitrails/discussion.mdwn?ds=inline diff --git a/doc/todo/wikitrails/discussion.mdwn b/doc/todo/wikitrails/discussion.mdwn index 9de2cb7d4..9dbbb6bc8 100644 --- a/doc/todo/wikitrails/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/wikitrails/discussion.mdwn @@ -1 +1,80 @@ -This sounds like a more general version of what I want for one-photo-per-page galleries, where each page has previous|up|next links (like this plugin) and the index page has a list or grid of thumbnails (\[[!inline]] with a specially modified template perhaps). I'll watch this with interest! --[[smcv]] +This is a nice idea, I do have my gripes about the imeplementation. + +Assuming that the index's list is in mdwn format is not ideal. I guess the +other way to do it would be to make the index be a directive, something +like: \[[!trail pages="foo bar baz"]]. Assuming that a flat trail structure +is enough, otherwise you'd have to get more fancy. + +The trailinclude seems a bit redundant with inline, and wanting to inline +together all pages in a trail for printing or whatever seems like an +unusual use case anyway? + +The !trail directive could be simplified to just \[[!trail my_indexpage]]. +But I wonder if needing to add this directive to every page is the best +approach. Alternate approach would be to make the trail index cause +breadcrums to be automatically inserted at the top of every page on the +trail. (You'd have to use a directive to define the index for that to work.) + +--[[Joey]] + +---- + +Revisiting this, after effectively reimplementing a small version of it +in [[plugins/contrib/album]]: it occurs to me that might be a more +"ikiwiki-like" way we could get this functionality. + +In the index page, you either want an [[ikiwiki/directive/inline]], or +a list of links. In the former case, maybe we could extend inline like +this: + + \[[!inline ... blah blah ... trail=yes]] + +to make it remember the pages it inlined, in order, in the pagestate; +in the latter case, we could replace the wikilinks with a directive, +an operation something like this in diff notation: + + - \[[one]] - the unit + - \[[two]] - the base of binary + - \[[three|3]] - is a crowd + + \[[!trailitem one]] - the unit + + \[[!trailitem two]] - the base of binary + + \[[!trailitem three|3]] - is a crowd + +and have that directive remember the pages in order. + +In both cases, a scan() hook could clear the list before starting to +scan, then the inline or trailitem preprocessor directive could run in +the scan stage as well as the render stage (in the case of inline, +there'd be a very early return if trail=yes was not given, and +an early return after collecting and sorting the pages if not +actually rendering). + +This would mean that the contents of the trail, and a list of +trails in which each page can be found, would already be in +the pagestate by the time any page was rendered, so we'd be able +to use them for output, either in a pagetemplate() hook or +a \[[!trail]] preprocessor directive. + +This way, my album plugin could be turned inside out: instead +of precomputing the pages to be inlined, then using +[[pagenames|todo/inline plugin: specifying ordered page names]] +to get them into the inline, it could just do the inline, then +incorporate the output of \[[!trail]] into the template rendered +for \[[!albumimage]] on each viewer page. (Also, the viewers +wouldn't necessarily need to reference the album, only the other +way round.) + +Using a pagetemplate() hook to stuff the next/previous links +into page.tmpl would actually be a bit unfortunate for \[[!album]], +because that plugin definitely wants to style the next/previous +links as a thumbnail, which means there'd have to be a way to +affect the style - perhaps by arranging for album's pagetemplate +hook to run *after* trail's, or perhaps by having trail's +pagetemplate hook disable itself for pages that contain +a \[[!trail]] directive. + +I have now implemented this at [[plugins/contrib/trail]]. +What do you think? I'm still not sure how it would relate +to [[plugins/contrib/album]], but if trail is reviewed +and approved in principle, I'll try to adapt album as +outlined above. --[[smcv]]