X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/1888464a0d9de9cf4ac40c298924018437758aa2..4729ff0812c1f3d06d98524e2fec232d3bf90513:/doc/tips/ikiwiki_as_a_requirements_management_tool/discussion.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/tips/ikiwiki_as_a_requirements_management_tool/discussion.mdwn b/doc/tips/ikiwiki_as_a_requirements_management_tool/discussion.mdwn
index 94f0f8b4b..26eae28a5 100644
--- a/doc/tips/ikiwiki_as_a_requirements_management_tool/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/tips/ikiwiki_as_a_requirements_management_tool/discussion.mdwn
@@ -16,3 +16,6 @@ This could be as simple as adding a link, fo e.g. :
     + \[[attributes/non-functional]]
 
 You just have to create pages for each attribute you want and then pagespec could be used to filter requirements by attributes. I think something similar is used to trac bug with ikiwiki (linking to a \[[done]] page, etc.).
+
+---
+Generally speaking, I think it's always a good idea to get back to the "basics" for something, that huge and expensive tools were made for. But I'm doubtful if such a text oriented tool would really fit all needs of a requirements engineering tool... so what is your real world experience with your requirements engineering tool as described?