X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/0ca509859be54fa167ba8f0514dd10e3f96aaa58..cf1290eb464f1256aa5c12d973fff774e4f83e5e:/doc/todo/admonitions.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/admonitions.mdwn b/doc/todo/admonitions.mdwn index 65bb530e7..c68ce11f8 100644 --- a/doc/todo/admonitions.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/admonitions.mdwn @@ -134,3 +134,18 @@ admonition styles in either `style.css` or in every shipped theme. But I'm more and your current plugin actually exists and IkiWiki is starving for contributors (IMHO) so I encourage maintainers to merge it. I will probably merge it into [opinionated ikiwiki](https://jmtd.net/log/opinionated_ikiwiki/) in either case (which will at least mean there'll be another avenue for people to check it out) *— [[Jon]], 2020-08-07* + +> One quick tip/request, [[anarcat]]: If you could update the "master" branch in your IkiWiki +> fork to match the merge base for your branches, it would be easy to use Gitlab's "compare" +> feature in-browser to see a combined diff of your changes. *— [[Jon]], 2020-08-07* + +> > Thanks for your support and comments! :) I don't have the time to manage another extra branch on top of the stack I already have unfortunately. but it might be simpler for me in the future... I keep on hoping all patches get merged and that i don't need to (more officially) fork `master`, but it seems that's where I need to go myself... In the meantime you can see the list of patches I maintain in [[users/anarcat]] and [my maintenance log](https://anarc.at/services/wiki/). I hope that helps! -- [[anarcat]] + +> > Turns out I found the time. I merged all my active branches in the `master` branch on gitlab. not sure what you'd compare it against, but there, it's done. :) [[anarcat]] + +>>> Thanks for that! I'll try to explain what I meant in terms of an example. your `admonitions` is a series of commits that ultimately sit on top of +>>> upstream's `d0099568` ("Prepare release for unstable"). If I want to see a quick combined diff of all the changes made in that branch, I can try to +>>> use GitLab's "Compare" feature, but it does not let me specify a SHA to compare against, only a ref-name such as (your) `master`, which (at the time) +>>> was a much earlier commit than `d0099568`, so "Compare" would include all the unrelated upstream changes. If instead either `master` was `d0099568`, or +>>> `admonitions` was rebased on top of whatever your `master` was, then GitLab's "Compare" would be useful. As it is, I cloned locally and did the necessary +>>> `git` incantation. *— [[Jon]], 2020-08-12*