X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/0bb605baf8702d1a5d1ee16f52b07840d88616e7..3b49868eb98e33204ca52ba944be4023f9f3f821:/doc/security.mdwn diff --git a/doc/security.mdwn b/doc/security.mdwn index b294decc8..723daeccc 100644 --- a/doc/security.mdwn +++ b/doc/security.mdwn @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -Let's do an ikiwiki security analysis.. +Let's do an ikiwiki security analysis. If you are using ikiwiki to render pages that only you can edit, do not generate any wrappers, and do not use the cgi, then there are no more @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ security issues with this program than with cat(1). If, however, you let others edit pages in your wiki, then some possible security issues do need to be kept in mind. +[[toc levels=2]] + ---- # Probable holes @@ -16,12 +18,12 @@ _(The list of things to fix.)_ Anyone with direct commit access can forge "web commit from foo" and make it appear on [[RecentChanges]] like foo committed. One way to avoid -this would be to limit web commits to those done by a certian user. +this would be to limit web commits to those done by a certain user. ## other stuff to look at I need to audit the git backend a bit, and have been meaning to -see if any CRLF injection type things can be done. +see if any CRLF injection type things can be done in the CGI code. ---- @@ -39,32 +41,39 @@ who's viewing the wiki, that can be a security problem. Of course nobody else seems to worry about this in other wikis, so should we? -Currently only people with direct svn commit access can upload such files -(and if you wanted to you could block that with a svn pre-commit hook). -Wsers with only web commit access are limited to editing pages as ikiwiki +Currently only people with direct commit access can upload such files +(and if you wanted to you could block that with a pre-commit hook). +Users with only web commit access are limited to editing pages as ikiwiki doesn't support file uploads from browsers (yet), so they can't exploit this. +It is possible to embed an image in a page edited over the web, by using +`img src="data:image/png;"`. Ikiwiki's htmlscrubber only allows `data:` +urls to be used for `image/*` mime types. It's possible that some broken +browser might ignore the mime type and if the data provided is not an +image, instead run it as javascript, or something evil like that. Hopefully +not many browsers are that broken. + ## multiple accessors of wiki directory -If multiple people can write to the source directory ikiwiki is using, or -to the destination directory it writes files to, then one can cause trouble -for the other when they run ikiwiki through symlink attacks. +If multiple people can directly write to the source directory ikiwiki is +using, or to the destination directory it writes files to, then one can +cause trouble for the other when they run ikiwiki through symlink attacks. -So it's best if only one person can ever write to those directories. +So it's best if only one person can ever directly write to those directories. ## setup files -Setup files are not safe to keep in subversion with the rest of the wiki. -Just don't do it. [[ikiwiki.setup]] is *not* used as the setup file for -this wiki, BTW. +Setup files are not safe to keep in the same revision control repository +with the rest of the wiki. Just don't do it. [[ikiwiki.setup]] is *not* +used as the setup file for this wiki, BTW. -## page locking can be bypassed via direct svn commits +## page locking can be bypassed via direct commits -A locked page can only be edited on the web by an admin, but -anyone who is allowed to commit direct to svn can bypass this. This is by -design, although a subversion pre-commit hook could be used to prevent -editing of locked pages when using subversion, if you really need to. +A locked page can only be edited on the web by an admin, but anyone who is +allowed to commit directly to the repository can bypass this. This is by +design, although a pre-commit hook could be used to prevent editing of +locked pages, if you really need to. ## web server attacks @@ -78,11 +87,15 @@ they can try to use this to exploit your web server. _(AKA, the assumptions that will be the root of most security holes...)_ -## exploting ikiwiki with bad content +## exploiting ikiwiki with bad content Someone could add bad content to the wiki and hope to exploit ikiwiki. Note that ikiwiki runs with perl taint checks on, so this is unlikely. +One fun thing in ikiwiki is its handling of a PageSpec, which involves +translating it into perl and running the perl. Of course, this is done +*very* carefully to guard against injecting arbitrary perl code. + ## publishing cgi scripts ikiwiki does not allow cgi scripts to be published as part of the wiki. Or @@ -116,8 +129,8 @@ page to edit. It has to make sure to sanitise this page, to prevent eg, editing of ../../../foo, or editing of files that are not part of the wiki, such as subversion dotfiles. This is done by sanitising the filename removing unallowed characters, then making sure it doesn't start with "/" -or contain ".." or "/.svn/". Annoyingly ad-hoc, this kind of code is where -security holes breed. It needs a test suite at the very least. +or contain ".." or "/.svn/", etc. Annoyingly ad-hoc, this kind of code is +where security holes breed. It needs a test suite at the very least. ## CGI::Session security @@ -130,7 +143,9 @@ file not be world readable. Login to the wiki involves sending a password in cleartext over the net. Cracking the password only allows editing the wiki as that user though. -If you care, you can use https, I suppose. +If you care, you can use https, I suppose. If you do use https either for +all of the wiki, or just the cgi access, then consider using the sslcookie +option. ## XSS holes in CGI output @@ -141,6 +156,27 @@ with a username containing html code (anymore). It's difficult to know for sure if all such avenues have really been closed though. +## HTML::Template security + +If the [[plugins/template]] plugin is enabled, users can modify templates +like any other part of the wiki. This assumes that HTML::Template is secure +when used with untrusted/malicious templates. (Note that includes are not +allowed, so that's not a problem.) + +---- + +# Plugins + +The security of [[plugins]] depends on how well they're written and what +external tools they use. The plugins included in ikiwiki are all held to +the same standards as the rest of ikiwiki, but with that said, here are +some security notes for them. + +* The [[plugins/img]] plugin assumes that imagemagick/perlmagick are secure + from malformed image attacks. Imagemagick has had security holes in the + past. To be able to exploit such a hole, a user would need to be able to + upload images to the wiki. + ---- # Fixed holes @@ -175,13 +211,13 @@ wouldn't see. To avoid this, ikiwiki will skip over symlinks when scanning for pages, and uses locking to prevent more than one instance running at a time. The lock -prevents one ikiwiki from running a svn up at the wrong time to race -another ikiwiki. So only attackers who can write to the working copy on -their own can race it. +prevents one ikiwiki from running a svn up/git pull/etc at the wrong time +to race another ikiwiki. So only attackers who can write to the working +copy on their own can race it. ## symlink + cgi attacks -Similarly, a svn commit of a symlink could be made, ikiwiki ignores it +Similarly, a commit of a symlink could be made, ikiwiki ignores it because of the above, but the symlink is still there, and then you edit the page from the web, which follows the symlink when reading the page (exposing the content), and again when saving the changed page (changing @@ -234,3 +270,99 @@ have come just before yours, by forging svn log output. This was guarded against by using svn log --xml. ikiwiki escapes any html in svn commit logs to prevent other mischief. + +## XML::Parser + +XML::Parser is used by the aggregation plugin, and has some security holes. +Bug #[378411](http://bugs.debian.org/378411) does not +seem to affect our use, since the data is not encoded as utf-8 at that +point. #[378412](http://bugs.debian.org/378412) could affect us, although it +doesn't seem very exploitable. It has a simple fix, and has been fixed in +Debian unstable. + +## include loops + +Various directives that cause one page to be included into another could +be exploited to DOS the wiki, by causing a loop. Ikiwiki has always guarded +against this one way or another; the current solution should detect all +types of loops involving preprocessor directives. + +## Online editing of existing css and images + +A bug in ikiwiki allowed the web-based editor to edit any file that was in +the wiki, not just files that are page sources. So an attacker (or a +genuinely helpful user, which is how the hole came to light) could edit +files like style.css. It is also theoretically possible that an attacker +could have used this hole to edit images or other files in the wiki, with +some difficulty, since all editing would happen in a textarea. + +This hole was discovered on 10 Feb 2007 and fixed the same day with the +release of ikiwiki 1.42. A fix was also backported to Debian etch, as +version 1.33.1. I recommend upgrading to one of these versions if your wiki +allows web editing. + +## html insertion via title + +Missing html escaping of the title contents allowed a web-based editor to +insert arbitrary html inside the title tag of a page. Since that part of +the page is not processed by the htmlscrubber, evil html could be injected. + +This hole was discovered on 21 March 2007 and fixed the same day (er, hour) +with the release of ikiwiki 1.46. A fix was also backported to Debian etch, +as version 1.33.2. I recommend upgrading to one of these versions if your +wiki allows web editing or aggregates feeds. + +## javascript insertion via meta tags + +It was possible to use the meta plugin's meta tags to insert arbitrary +url contents, which could be used to insert stylesheet information +containing javascript. This was fixed by sanitising meta tags. + +This hole was discovered on 21 March 2007 and fixed the same day +with the release of ikiwiki 1.47. A fix was also backported to Debian etch, +as version 1.33.3. I recommend upgrading to one of these versions if your +wiki can be edited by third parties. + +## insufficient checking for symlinks in srcdir path + +Ikiwiki did not check if path to the srcdir to contained a symlink. If an +attacker had commit access to the directories in the path, they could +change it to a symlink, causing ikiwiki to read and publish files that were +not intended to be published. (But not write to them due to other checks.) + +In most configurations, this is not exploitable, because the srcdir is +checked out of revision control, but the directories leading up to it are +not. Or, the srcdir is a single subdirectory of a project in revision +control (ie, `ikiwiki/doc`), and if the subdirectory were a symlink, +ikiwiki would still typically not follow it. + +There are at least two configurations where this is exploitable: + +* If the srcdir is a deeper subdirectory of a project. For example if it is + `project/foo/doc`, an an attacker can replace `foo` with a symlink to a + directory containing a `doc` directory (not a symlink), then ikiwiki + would follow the symlink. +* If the path to the srcdir in ikiwiki's configuration ended in "/", + and the srcdir is a single subdirectory of a project, (ie, + `ikiwiki/doc/`), the srcdir could be a symlink and ikiwiki would not + notice. + +This security hole was discovered on 26 November 2007 and fixed the same +day with the release of ikiwiki 2.14. I recommend upgrading to this version +if your wiki can be committed to by third parties. Alternatively, don't use +a trailing slash in the srcdir, and avoid the (unusual) configurations that +allow the security hole to be exploited. + +## javascript insertion via uris + +The htmlscrubber did not block javascript in uris. This was fixed by adding +a whitelist of valid uri types, which does not include javascript. +([[cve CVE-2008-0809]]) Some urls specifyable by the meta plugin could also +theoretically have been used to inject javascript; this was also blocked +([[cve CVE-2008-0808]]). + +This hole was discovered on 10 February 2008 and fixed the same day +with the release of ikiwiki 2.31.1. (And a few subsequent versions..) +A fix was also backported to Debian etch, as version 1.33.4. I recommend +upgrading to one of these versions if your wiki can be edited by third +parties.