X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/09b0a3b73f7c9ca873c3e20a64b124c0749b3d3b..bccea01c07a112f4ded504724557085c870b56f6:/doc/todo/CSS_classes_for_links.mdwn?ds=inline

diff --git a/doc/todo/CSS_classes_for_links.mdwn b/doc/todo/CSS_classes_for_links.mdwn
index ad4813eb2..43a480be8 100644
--- a/doc/todo/CSS_classes_for_links.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/CSS_classes_for_links.mdwn
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ My best regards,
 >>> I also think this should be in an external plugin, not in ikiwiki.
 >>>
 
+I find CSS3 support still spotty...  Here are some notes on how to do this in IkiWiki with jQuery: <http://iki.u32.net/setup/External_Links> --[[sabr]]
+
 > If you need to achieve this in IkiWiki itself, I imagine you could create a
 > plugin which runs in the `format` phase of rendering and search/replaces
 > specific link patterns.  This should be a fairly simple exercise in regular
@@ -70,6 +72,23 @@ My best regards,
 > controls a link is when an internal link is added using a WikiLink.
 >
 > (Note that tags get their own special
-> [[rel_attribute|rel_attribute_for_link]] now that CSS can use.)
+> [[rel_attribute|rel_attribute_for_links]] now that CSS can use.)
 > 
 > --[[Joey]]
+
+>> I had a little look at this, last weekend. I added a class definition to
+>> the `htmllink` call in `linkify` in `link.pm`. It works pretty well, but
+>> I'd also need to adjust other `htmllink` calls (map, inline, etc.). I found
+>> other methods (CSS3 selectors, etc.) to be unreliable.
+>> 
+>> Would you potentially accept a patch that added `class="internal"` to
+>> various `htmllink` calls in ikiwiki?
+>> 
+>> How configurable do you think this behaviour should be? I'm considering a
+>> config switch to enable or disable this behaviour, or possibly a
+>> configurable list of class names to append for internal links (defaulting
+>> to an empty list for backwards compatibility)>
+>> 
+>> As an alternative to patching the uses of `htmllink`, what do you think
+>> about patching `htmllink` itself? Are there circumstances where it might be
+>> used to generate a non-internal link? -- [[Jon]]