X-Git-Url: http://git.vanrenterghem.biz/git.ikiwiki.info.git/blobdiff_plain/06de9da609bb79438729c686ca5721d0415b4894..a0deb3038c45c066e2c0c3acb8c6c4a93ca3301d:/doc/todo/darcs.mdwn?ds=inline diff --git a/doc/todo/darcs.mdwn b/doc/todo/darcs.mdwn index a410f5ecf..e5bf5ee27 100644 --- a/doc/todo/darcs.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/darcs.mdwn @@ -486,11 +486,14 @@ It's got couple of FIXMEs, and a very site-specific filter for recentchanges. No --- -And here's yet another one. :) +And here's yet another one, including an updated `ikiwiki-makerepo`. :) - + (now a darcs repo) -I've taken all the good stuff from the above and added the missing hooks. Some of them I haven't had a chance to test, namely `rcs_rename`, `rcs_remove`, `rcs_commit_staged`, and `rcs_diff`. Also, I'm not experienced with perl and don't know where I should have used the function `possibly_foolish_untaint`. +> Note that there's a 'darcs' branch in git that I'm keeping a copy of your +> code in. Just in case. :-) + +I've taken all the good stuff from the above and added the missing hooks. The code hasn't seen a lot of testing, so some bugs are likely yet to surface. Also, I'm not experienced with perl and don't know where I should have used the function `possibly_foolish_untaint`. Regarding the repository layout: There are two darcs repositories. One is the `srcdir`, the other we'll call `master`. @@ -523,4 +526,26 @@ Regarding the repository layout: There are two darcs repositories. One is the `s > * Is the the darcs info in [[details]] still up-to-date re this version? > --[[Joey]] +> Update: +> +> I think I've addressed all of the above except for the XML parsing in `darcs_info`. +> The function determines the md5 hash of the last patch the given file appears in. +> That's indeed being done with regexps but my Perl isn't good enough for a quick recode +> right now. +> +> As for the darcs info in [[rcs/details]], it does not accurately describe the way +> this version works. It's similar, but the details differ slightly. +> You could copy my description above to replace it. +> +> There is still some ironing to do, for instance the current version doesn't allow for +> modifying attachments by re-uploading them via CGI ("darcs add failed"). Am I assuming +> correctly that "adding" a file that's already in the repo should just be a no-op? +> --pesco + +>> It should result in the new file contents being committed by +>> `rcs_commit_staged`. For some revision control systems, which +>> automatically commit modifications, it would be a no-op. --[[Joey]] + +>>> Done. --pesco + [[!tag patch]]