> problem. You can see the feed validator complain about it here:
> <http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidj.org%2Frss.xml>
>
> problem. You can see the feed validator complain about it here:
> <http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidj.org%2Frss.xml>
>
> un-esxaped html is part of the description field. Probably other feed
> parsers are more lenient. --[[Joey]]
> un-esxaped html is part of the description field. Probably other feed
> parsers are more lenient. --[[Joey]]
>>> On the off chance that you retained a copy of the old state, I'd not
>>> mind having a copy to investigate. --[[Joey]]
>>> On the off chance that you retained a copy of the old state, I'd not
>>> mind having a copy to investigate. --[[Joey]]