add bug about transitive dependencies

[git.ikiwiki.info.git] / doc / todo / Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn b/doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn
index 084f033042f04e7636752d5a13d0e6696c2380e3..e42f22970825ccaa5ccac88994e4b865350f9abb 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn
@@ -87,6 +87,17 @@ be very convenient.
 >> rst_header (that you sensibly would do, I think) that couldn't be done in
 >> the Python script. `rst_header` has very limited use, but it is another
 >> possibility, mainly for the user-editable aspect. --[[ulrik]]
 >> rst_header (that you sensibly would do, I think) that couldn't be done in
 >> the Python script. `rst_header` has very limited use, but it is another
 >> possibility, mainly for the user-editable aspect. --[[ulrik]]

+>>
+>> (I foresaw only two things to be added to the rst_header: the default
+>> role could be configured there (as with rst_wikirole), and if you have a
+>> meta-role like :shortcut:, shortcuts could be defined there.)
+>
+> I have some discussion on the [docutils mailing list][dml], the developers
+> of docutils seems to favor "Proposal 1", while I defend my ideas. They
+> want all users of ReST to use only the basic featureset to remain
+> compatible, of course. -- [[ulrik]]
+
+[dml]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.text.docutils.user/5376

 
 Some rst-custom [examples are here](http://kaizer.se/wiki/rst_examples/)
 
 
 Some rst-custom [examples are here](http://kaizer.se/wiki/rst_examples/)
 


@@ -166,9 +177,9 @@ picture before it.
 >>>> :wiki:`wikilink` syntax) to any other markup, for example None.
 >>>> --[[ulrik]]
 >> 
 >>>> :wiki:`wikilink` syntax) to any other markup, for example None.
 >>>> --[[ulrik]]
 >> 

->> The named link syntax (just like the :wiki: role) are inspired from trac
->> and a good fit, but only if the wiki is committed to using only rst,
->> which I don't think is the case.
+>> The named link syntax (just like the :wiki: role) are inspired from
+>> [trac][tracrst] and a good fit, but only if the wiki is committed to
+>> using only rst, which I don't think is the case.

 >>
 >> The rst-customize changes are very useful for custom directive
 >> installations (like the sourcecode directive, or shortcut roles I show
 >>
 >> The rst-customize changes are very useful for custom directive
 >> installations (like the sourcecode directive, or shortcut roles I show


@@ -203,6 +214,13 @@ picture before it.
 >> -- [[ulrik]] 
 
 >>> Seems it could be, yes. --[[Joey]]
 >> -- [[ulrik]] 
 
 >>> Seems it could be, yes. --[[Joey]]

+>>>
+>>>> It is not clear how we can work around reST wrapping directives with
+>>>> paragraph tags. Also, some escaping of xml characters & <> might
+>>>> happen, but I can't imagine right now what breakage can come from that.
+>>>> -- [[ulrik]]
+
+[tracrst]: http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/WikiRestructuredText

 
 ### Implementation ###
 
 
 ### Implementation ###