-Better links
-------------
-
-Once the fix to
-[[bugs/pagetitle_function_does_not_respect_meta_titles]] from
-[[intrigeri]]'s `meta` branch is merged into ikiwiki upstream, the
-generated links' text will be optionally based on the page titles set
-with the [[meta|plugins/meta]] plugin, and will thus be translatable.
-It will also allow displaying the translation status in links to slave
-pages. Both were implemented, and reverted in commit
-ea753782b222bf4ba2fb4683b6363afdd9055b64, which should be reverted
-once [[intrigeri]]'s `meta` branch is merged.
-
-An integration branch, called `meta-po`, merges [[intrigeri]]'s `po`
-and `meta` branches, and thus has this additional features.
-
-Self links
-----------
-
-If a page contains a WikiLink to itself, ikiwiki does not normally
-turn that into a hyperlink. However, if a translated page contains a
-WikiLink to itself, a hyperlink is inserted, at least with the default
-`po_link_to` the link points to the English version of the page. Is there a
-good reason for that to be done? --[[Joey]]
-
-> The commit 0113c69d4fb in my po branch might fix this. --[[intrigeri]]
-
->> It may fix it in passing, but shouldn't it also be fixed for the other
->> `po_link_to` styles?
-
->>> Other `po_link_to` styles already work ok: say there is
->>> a \[[dest]] link on a page called `dest`. When rendering
->>> `dest.LL`, `mybestlink` returns `dest.LL`, and `htmllink` is then
->>> able to detect, and manage correctly, that it is a self-link.
->>> --[[intrigeri]]
-
->> (Also, if `mybestlink` is going to always just return `bestlink` in
->> this case, there seems no reason to inject it.) --[[Joey]]
-
->>> Right. Commit cdc3576c8d1efb2 in my po branch prevents
->>> `mybestlink` to be injected when `po_link_to` is
->>> `default`. --[[intrigeri]]
-
-Language display order
-----------------------
-
-Jonas pointed out that one might want to control the order that links to
-other languages are listed, for various reasons. Currently, there is no
-order, as `po_slave_languages` is a hash. It would need to be converted
-to an array to support this. (If twere done, twere best done quickly.)
---[[Joey]]
-
-Duplicate %links ?
-------------------
-
-I notice code in the scan hook that seems to assume
-that %links will accumulate duplicate links for a page.
-That used to be so, but the bug was fixed. Does this mean
-that po might be replacing the only link on a page, in error?
---[[Joey]]
-
-> It would replace it. The only problematic case is when another
-> plugin has its own reasons, in its `scan` hook, to add a page
-> that is already there to `$links{$page}`. This other plugin's
-> effect might then be changed by po's `scan` hook... which could
-> be either good (better overall l10n) or bad (break the other
-> plugin's goal). --[[intrigeri]]
-
->> Right.. well, the cases where links are added is very small.
->> Grepping for `add_link`, it's just done by link, camelcase, meta, and
->> tag. All of these are supposed to work just link regular links
->> so I'd think that is ok. We could probably remove the currently scary
->> comment about only wanting to change the first link. --[[Joey]]
-
->>> Commit 3c2bffe21b91684 in my po branch does this. --[[intrigeri]]