<http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~willu/monotone-ikiwiki.diff>
-At the moment it supports basic committing and listing recent changes. It does not support rcs_notify() or rcs_getctime() yet. Moreover,
-while there is support for simultaneous commits (e.g. conflicts), it is untested and if it happens to work would leave the repository in an unmerged state.
+At the moment it is basically complete. At present rcs_notify() is implemeted but untested, the rest is implemented and tested.
-But it is better than nothing.
+In an older version of the patch
+there was support for simultaneous commits, but any conflicts left the repository in an unmerged state which had to be cleaned up using the non-web
+monotone interface. The user's data was still stored, and the user was informed if that happened.
-> For sure. The conflict issue seems like the main problem. I might just add it to ikiwiki and mark is as experimental and known buggy though. :-) --[[Joey]]
+The current version of the patch handles conflicts through the web interface. It is still not perfect as it will break if there is a rename that conflicts with a web change (but so will the other Rcs plugins I think). It also commits a revision with conflict markers if there is a conflict requiring such markers... ick.
Note: This patch requires the Monotone perl module, which is only available in Monotone 0.36 or later. The module is in the Monotone contrib/ directory. While 0.36 is relatively new, that Monotone module itself will work with a monotone binary back quite a few releases.
+Apparently this module did't make some versions of the monotone 0.36 release tarball. It is available from the monotone repository here: <http://viewmtn.angrygoats.net/branch/changes/net.venge.monotone>.
+
+> The setup instructions to add 40 lines of code to monotonerc is pretty frightning stuff.
+> Is there some way this can be automated? --[[Joey]]
+
+> Having rcs_commit return a warning message when there's an unresolved conflict
+> isn't right; that message will populate the page edit box. You might want
+> to use the error() function here?
+
+> There'an incomplete comment ending with "note, this relies on the fact that"
[[tag patch]]