## The big list of possibilities
-* [[plugins/contrib/highlightcode]] uses [[cpan Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate]],
+* [[plugins/contrib/highlightcode]] uses [[!cpan Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate]],
operates on whole source files only, has a few bugs (see
[here](http://u32.net/Highlight_Code_Plugin/), and needs to be updated to
support [[bugs/multiple_pages_with_same_name]].
-* [[cpan IkiWiki-Plugin-syntax]] only operates as a directive.
+* [[!cpan IkiWiki-Plugin-syntax]] only operates as a directive.
Interestingly, it supports multiple highlighting backends, including Kate
and Vim.
* [[plugins/contrib/syntax]] only operates as a directive
([[not_on_source_code_files|automatic_use_of_syntax_plugin_on_source_code_files]]),
- and uses [[cpan Text::VimColor]].
+ and uses [[!cpan Text::VimColor]].
* [[plugins/contrib/sourcehighlight]] uses src-highlight, and operates on
whole source files only. Needs to be updated to
support [[bugs/multiple_pages_with_same_name]].
* [[sourcecode|todo/automatic_use_of_syntax_plugin_on_source_code_files/discussion]]
also uses src-highlight, and operates on whole source files.
Updated to work with the fix for [[bugs/multiple_pages_with_same_name]]. Untested with files with no extension, e.g. `Makefile`.
+* [[users/jasonblevins]]'s code plugin uses src-highlight, and supports both
+ while file and directive use.
## General problems
we could use an external plugin..)
* Currently no single plugin supports both modes of operation (directive
and whole source file to page).
+
+ > This is now fixed by the [[ikiwiki/directive/format]] directive for all
+ > whole-source-file plugins, right?
+
* Nothing seems to support
[[wiki-formatted_comments|wiki-formatted_comments_with_syntax_plugin]]
inside source files. Doing this probably means post-processing the
results of the highlighting engine, to find places where it's highlighted
comments, and then running them through the ikiwiki rendering pipeline.
- This seems fairly doable with [[cpan Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate]],
+ This seems fairly doable with [[!cpan Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate]],
at least.
* The whole-file plugins tend to have a problem that things that look like
wikilinks in the source code get munged into links by ikiwiki, which can
One approach that's also been requested for eg,
[[plugins/contrib/mediawiki]] is to allow controlling which linkification
types a page type can have on it.
+
+ > The previous two points seem to be related. One thought: instead of
+ > getting the source from the `content` parameter, the plugin could
+ > re-load the page source. That would stop directives/links from
+ > being processed in the source. As noted above, comments
+ > could then be parsed for directives/links later.
+ >
+ > Would it be worth adding a `nodirectives` option when registering
+ > an htmlize hook that switches off directive and link processing before
+ > generating the html for a page?
+
* The whole-file plugins all get confused if there is a `foo.c` and a `foo.h`.
This is trivially fixable now by passing the keepextension option when
registering the htmlize hooks, though.
extensions. The workaround is to use a directive on a wiki page, pulling
in the Makefile.
+ > I wonder how hard it would be to make a patch whereby a file with
+ > no `.` in the name, and a name that matches a filetype, and where
+ > that filetype was registered `keepextension`, then the file is just
+ > chosen as the appropriate type. This would allow `Makefile` to
+ > work.
+
+like this:
+
+ diff --git a/IkiWiki.pm b/IkiWiki.pm
+ index 8d728c9..1bd46a9 100644
+ --- a/IkiWiki.pm
+ +++ b/IkiWiki.pm
+ @@ -618,6 +618,8 @@ sub pagetype ($) {
+
+ if ($page =~ /\.([^.]+)$/) {
+ return $1 if exists $hooks{htmlize}{$1};
+ + } elsif ($hooks{htmlize}{$page}{keepextension}) {
+ + return $page;
+ }
+ return;
+ }
+
## format directive
Rather than making syntax highlight plugins have to provide a preprocessor
plugin. OTOH, if "rst" were given, it would run the text through the rst
htmlizer. So, more generic, allows mixing different types of markup on one
page, as well as syntax highlighting. Does require specifying the type of
-format, instead of allows it to be guessed (which some syntax highlighters
-can do).
+format, instead of allowing it to be guessed (which some syntax highlighters
+can do). (This directive is now implemented..)
Hmm, this would also allow comments inside source files to have mdwn
embedded in them, without making the use of mdwn a special case, or needing