response

[git.ikiwiki.info.git] / doc / plugins / rst / discussion.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/plugins/rst/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/rst/discussion.mdwn
index 68e8f514f6c92774101afe0e5c24bcd839ed0cf5..a792b670f7cf0fd63008804e40aef95c6a4df460 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/plugins/rst/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/plugins/rst/discussion.mdwn
@@ -1,14 +1,17 @@
+The main problem with more sophisticated RST support is that ikiwiki turns 
+preprocessor directives into raw HTML and reST hates inline HTML.
+inline relies on Markdown's handling of raw HTML, specifically
+that it doesn't wrap paragraph-level `<div>`s in `<p>` tags -- see 
+[[todo/htmlvalidation]]. Other plugins might expect their output to be 
+interpreted in certain ways too -- [[Joey]] mentions toggleable and fortune.
+

 Is [prest][1] the perl version of the reST processor referred to in the text?
 It seems to be reasonably well-maintained to me, and differences between it and
 Is [prest][1] the perl version of the reST processor referred to in the text?
 It seems to be reasonably well-maintained to me, and differences between it and

-"standard" reST are pretty minor (a fairly exhaustive list, taken from the 
-prest docs, is at the end of this page).
+"standard" reST are pretty minor. A fairly exhaustive list, taken from the 
+prest docs, follows:

 
 [1]: http://search.cpan.org/~nodine/Text-Restructured-0.003024/
 
 
 [1]: http://search.cpan.org/~nodine/Text-Restructured-0.003024/
 

-In addition, reST appears to allow raw HTML pass-through with the `raw` 
-directive, though I think a better solution would be expanding the format plugin
-interface. --Ethan
-

 An exhaustive list of differences between prest and "standard" reST follows:
 
 * fewer alternatives for bullet lists (only "+", "*" and "-")
 An exhaustive list of differences between prest and "standard" reST follows:
 
 * fewer alternatives for bullet lists (only "+", "*" and "-")