update for rename of ikiwikiusers.mdwn to jasatamanjogja.mdwn

[git.ikiwiki.info.git] / doc / todo / allow_TMPL__95__LOOP_in_template_directives.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/allow_TMPL__95__LOOP_in_template_directives.mdwn b/doc/todo/allow_TMPL__95__LOOP_in_template_directives.mdwn
index fb8b7095cfe8eaba2e50642a99bea298a7614d15..890c4cf4bf8b04fb2f3c4cee2d36ea0f85488a28 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/todo/allow_TMPL__95__LOOP_in_template_directives.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/allow_TMPL__95__LOOP_in_template_directives.mdwn
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-[[!tag patch]]
+[[!tag patch todo]]

 
 [[!template id="note" text="""
 Simply copied this from my website
 
 [[!template id="note" text="""
 Simply copied this from my website


@@ -6,10 +6,28 @@ Simply copied this from my website
 feel free to reformat / delete"""]]
 
 The following re-write allows for multiple definitions of the
 feel free to reformat / delete"""]]
 
 The following re-write allows for multiple definitions of the

-same tag value in a template definition.  This, in turn, allows
-us to use TMPL_LOOPS in our template directives; all-be-it in a
+same tag value in a [[plugins/template]] definition.  This, in turn, allows
+us to use TMPL_LOOPS in our [[ikiwiki/directive/template]] directives; all-be-it in a

 rather limited way.
 
 rather limited way.
 

+> I'm willing to consider such a feature, but it needs to be presented in
+> the form of a patch that is reviewable, not a gratuitous rewrite.
+> --[[Joey]] 
+
+>> Yes, my apologies for that.  The two worker functions `mktmpl_hash`
+and `proc_tmpl_hash` are new.  The `preprocess` function then starts
+by arranging the parameters into an array.  This array is passed to the
+`mktmpl_hash` and it creates a hash, suitable for passing into the
+HTML::Template directly.  The `proc_tmpl_hash` then walks the hash
+structure and processes the parameters.
+
+>> I know ... you weren't looking for an explanation, just a patch
+... totally understand.  Point I'm trying to make, it's a 90% re-write
+anyway (and my `style(8)` will probably piss most people off).
+
+>> Anyway, would love to contribute so will try to get to doing this
+"correctly" and post as a patch.
+

 I would, personally, only use this feature for very basic loops
 and, although nested loops *might* be possible (with a little
 more tinkering) it think any attempt would be better served by
 I would, personally, only use this feature for very basic loops
 and, although nested loops *might* be possible (with a little
 more tinkering) it think any attempt would be better served by