> You are entirely correct. I thought I'd seen it somewhere, but then couldn't
> find it when I came to use it. If the patch isn't applied (and I can see arguments
> on both sides of that debate), then at least a pointer to
> You are entirely correct. I thought I'd seen it somewhere, but then couldn't
> find it when I came to use it. If the patch isn't applied (and I can see arguments
> on both sides of that debate), then at least a pointer to