+
+I tested with amarok, and that also ignored the description.
+I am thinking of those where you have a mixed feed, and people
+using clients that ignore enclsures get pretty much a blank post,
+with just the filename, and the html page, which also just displays
+the filename.
+
+I don't think this is a big issue though, so I guess it's just which
+you think is the cleaner interface.
+
+I have also added the first of your ideas as well (though you seem to have
+removed it). It adds a parameter to inline `archive_after` which limits
+showing full entries to that number.
+
+<http://jameswestby.net/scratch/limit.diff>
+
+-- JamesWestby
+
+> I removed it because I don't really see the need for it anymore.
+> The added complexity doesn't seem worth it, unless someone needs the
+> features. --[[Joey]]
+
+And here is the updated podcast patch supporting any file type.
+
+<http://jameswestby.net/scratch/podcast2.diff>
+
+-- JamesWestby
+
+And here is a patch for the remaining item. It adds links to the bottom of
+inlined entries for edit and discuss (if they are enabled). It doesn't add
+links for edit if the filetype is not known.
+
+The stylesheet should probably be done slightly better than I have. I just
+added a bit of spacing as the links were too close to the date. I have no
+skill in this area though. Perhaps you would like to use the list system
+that you have for the links at the top.
+
+<http://jameswestby.net/scratch/actions.diff>
+
+-- JamesWestby
+
+> Thanks! I did tweak the css a bit. Not totally happy with it, but pretty
+> good I think. (I'll try to get to the other patches soon.) --[[Joey]]
+
+
+---
+
+I'm very happy to report that this is [[todo/done]]. Podcasting patch
+applied (finally!) --[[Joey]]