+ > This is basically the traillink/trailitem duality, too.
+ > I'd be quite tempted to generalize to something like this:
+ >
+ > We can't fix [[!link blocks="bug123" text="Bug 123"]] until we do this.
+ >
+ > [[!hiddenlink owner="smcv"]]
+ >
+ > but perhaps that's too wordy?
+ >
+ > I think both trail and tag need their own special processing beyond the
+ > general case, but maybe not? --[[smcv]]
+
+ >> i'd be all in favor of having this unified and deeper; there has been the
+ >> idea of a `\[[!link]]` directive [[again|todo/link plugin perhaps too general__63__]]
+ >> and [[again|todo/do not make links backwards]].
+ >>
+ >> i like the `\[[!link text=""]]` and `[[!hiddenlink]]` conventions, but
+ >> think that ${REL}="${TARGET}" isn't ideal because it implies that a single
+ >> link can have more than one target. instead, i'd go for
+ >> `\[[!link to="bug123" rel="blocks" text="Bug 123"]]; as with the html rel
+ >> parameter, rel would be a list of whitespace separated values.
+ >>
+ >> positional parameters (`\[[!link bug123 rel="blocks" text="Bug 123"]]` or
+ >> even `\[[!link Bug 123|bug123 rel="blocks"]]`) would be possible, but i
+ >> prefer explicit syntax and not joining stings back again with the
+ >> whitespace that was split off it before.
+ >>
+ >> if the '|' character is not widespread in page names (which i assume it is
+ >> not), instead of using positional parameters in `\[[!link]]` for
+ >> shortcuts, we could extend the regular link syntax; the same relationship
+ >> could then be declared as `\[[Bug 123|bug123|blocks]]`; this would be an
+ >> easy extension to the original link syntax. it would even work for hidden links
+ >> (`\[[|smcv|owner]]`), which previously made no sense because a link with
+ >> neither a physicial representation nor metadat is of no use.
+ >>
+ >> --[[chrysn]]
+