unindent the templatebody version to top level, it's getting hard to read otherwise

[git.ikiwiki.info.git] / doc / todo / clear_page_to_delete.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn b/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn
index ccb7634e5848c62d25174312342fbb041f1aa14f..95b25bf36cb4721531b7a5fa7253557cb0f4e53b 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ cleared to be entirely empty (or only have whitespace)? Discuss. --[[Joey]]
  I'd say so; yes. A method of deleting pages via the web would be great; I
 can't think of a use of keeping blank pages around. What about vandalism --
 if someone blanks a page and deletes it and someone else wishes to restore
-it; or is undoing edits via the web a bigger issue? -- [[JonDowland]]
+it; or is undoing edits via the web a bigger issue? -- [[users/Jon]]
 
 Of course there's already a way to delete pages (remove plugin). So the
 question is really:
@@ -24,3 +24,12 @@ the page.  That's what the user intended to do in this case.  The information
 content of an empty vs. a deleted page is essentially the same, I'd say.  But
 having ikiwiki remove those stale pages would save some (minimal, admittedly)
 time needed for manual clean-up.  --[[tschwinge]]
+
+On EmacsWiki, a page is marked for deletion when it contains just the DeletedPage 
+keyword and if there were no page editions since XX days. Here, I use pages that
+can be empty everyday and filled all day long. It does not make sense to me to 
+delete these pages :). --[[xma]]
+
+I was not aware of [[plugins/remove]]. I don't think another method is necessary -- [[users/Jon]]
+
+> Consensus seems to be [[won't fix|done]] as far as I can see. --[[smcv]]