oops

[git.ikiwiki.info.git] / doc / tips / integrated_issue_tracking_with_ikiwiki.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/tips/integrated_issue_tracking_with_ikiwiki.mdwn b/doc/tips/integrated_issue_tracking_with_ikiwiki.mdwn
index fcec5cb56bca5c913c557aa7a2c679d1aea5f039..0c871d6c04fbaa8f58c05ea75fd438b4f71b6723 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/tips/integrated_issue_tracking_with_ikiwiki.mdwn
+++ b/doc/tips/integrated_issue_tracking_with_ikiwiki.mdwn
@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
-[[meta title="Integrated issue tracking with Ikiwiki"]]
+[[!meta title="Integrated issue tracking with Ikiwiki"]]

 
 

-By Joey Hess, LinuxWorld.com
+[[!meta author="Joey Hess, LinuxWorld.com"]]

 
 

-[[template id=note text="""
+[[!meta copyright="""
+Copyright 2007 Joey Hess <joeyh@ikiwiki.info>, LinuxWorld.com  

 [First published](http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2007/040607-integrated-issue-tracking-ikiwiki.html)
 on [LinuxWorld.com](http://www.linuxworld.com/), a publication of Network
 World Inc., 118 Turnpike Rd., Southboro, MA 01772.
 """]]
 [First published](http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2007/040607-integrated-issue-tracking-ikiwiki.html)
 on [LinuxWorld.com](http://www.linuxworld.com/), a publication of Network
 World Inc., 118 Turnpike Rd., Southboro, MA 01772.
 """]]

+[[!meta license="[[GPL|freesoftware]]"]]

 
 Wikis are not just for encyclopedias and websites anymore. You can use
 Ikiwiki in combination with your revision control system to handle issue
 
 Wikis are not just for encyclopedias and websites anymore. You can use
 Ikiwiki in combination with your revision control system to handle issue


@@ -135,7 +137,7 @@ etc, to document different stages of
 their lifecycle. A developer can take ownership of a
 bug by tagging it with something like "owner/Joey".
 
 their lifecycle. A developer can take ownership of a
 bug by tagging it with something like "owner/Joey".
 

-To tag a wiki page, edit it and add text such as "\[[tag done]]". Note that
+To tag a wiki page, edit it and add text such as "\[[!tag done]]". Note that

 adding a wiki link to "\[[done]]" will have the same categorisation effect
 as a tag, but the link will show up in the body of the page, which is a
 nice effect if used in a sentence such as "This was \[[done]] in version
 adding a wiki link to "\[[done]]" will have the same categorisation effect
 as a tag, but the link will show up in the body of the page, which is a
 nice effect if used in a sentence such as "This was \[[done]] in version


@@ -153,23 +155,23 @@ be inlined into a given page. A few examples:
 * A typical list of all open bugs, with their full text, and a form to post new
   bugs.
 
 * A typical list of all open bugs, with their full text, and a form to post new
   bugs.
 

-        \[[inline pages="bugs/* and !link(done) and !*/Discussion" actions=yes postform=yes show=0]]
+        \[[!inline pages="bugs/* and !link(done) and !*/Discussion" actions=yes postform=yes show=0 rootpage="bugs"]]

 
 * Index of the 30 most recently fixed bugs.
 
 
 * Index of the 30 most recently fixed bugs.
 

-        \[[inline pages="bugs/* and link(done) and !*/Discussion" sort=mtime show=30 archive=yes]]
+        \[[!inline pages="bugs/* and link(done) and !*/Discussion" sort=mtime show=30 archive=yes]]

 
 * Index of the 10 most recently active bugs.
 
 
 * Index of the 10 most recently active bugs.
 

-        \[[inline pages="bugs/* and !link(done) and !*/Discussion" sort=mtime show=10]]
+        \[[!inline pages="bugs/* and !link(done) and !*/Discussion" sort=mtime show=10]]

 
 * Open security issues.
 
 
 * Open security issues.
 

-        \[[inline pages="bugs/* and link(security) and !link(done) and !*/Discussion"]]
+        \[[!inline pages="bugs/* and link(security) and !link(done) and !*/Discussion"]]

 
 * Full text of bugs assigned to Joey.
 
 
 * Full text of bugs assigned to Joey.
 

-        \[[inline pages="bugs/* and link(owner/Joey) and !link(done) and !*/Discussion" show=0]]
+        \[[!inline pages="bugs/* and link(owner/Joey) and !link(done) and !*/Discussion" show=0]]

 
 It may seem strange to consider using a wiki for issue tracking when there
 are several dedicated bug tracking systems, like Bugzilla, that handle all
 
 It may seem strange to consider using a wiki for issue tracking when there
 are several dedicated bug tracking systems, like Bugzilla, that handle all