>>You've already pointed out the need for (a) more structured discussion pages, (b) comments sent via mail, but I'm not sure whether that will be enough. This is because the nature of a wiki means that discussions are scattered all over the site, as people discuss in discussion pages about the given topic - and so they should. The consequence of this, however, is that one has a choice (in regard to RSS feeds) of having too much or too little. Too little, if one only feeds on news/todo/bugs/forum, since one misses out on discussions elsewhere. Too much, because the only other option appears to be subscribing to recentchanges, which will give one *everything*, whether it is relevant or not.
>>Unfortunately, I'm not really sure what the best solution is for this problem.
>>You've already pointed out the need for (a) more structured discussion pages, (b) comments sent via mail, but I'm not sure whether that will be enough. This is because the nature of a wiki means that discussions are scattered all over the site, as people discuss in discussion pages about the given topic - and so they should. The consequence of this, however, is that one has a choice (in regard to RSS feeds) of having too much or too little. Too little, if one only feeds on news/todo/bugs/forum, since one misses out on discussions elsewhere. Too much, because the only other option appears to be subscribing to recentchanges, which will give one *everything*, whether it is relevant or not.
>>Unfortunately, I'm not really sure what the best solution is for this problem.