Would you be receptive to a patch that e.g. called File::MimeInfo::Magic::default()
if ::magic() returns undef? --[[DavidBremner]]
+
+> Yes, that looks to be ok. --[[Joey]]
+
+>> OK, here is such a patch. One modification of previous behaviour is that
+>> that if default returns undef, this is returned. As far as I understand
+>> the code/doc for File::MimeInfo, under is used only as an error return
+>> for ::default
+
+>>> Applied