oh, we don't use comments here, do we?

[git.ikiwiki.info.git] / doc / todo / autoindex_should_use_add__95__autofile.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/autoindex_should_use_add__95__autofile.mdwn b/doc/todo/autoindex_should_use_add__95__autofile.mdwn
index 353168c4faa414c3c09ae19ea12eb215c30443c3..f3fb24c16fcba3e8710c4645a23c575ee22e9814 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/todo/autoindex_should_use_add__95__autofile.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/autoindex_should_use_add__95__autofile.mdwn
@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
 `add_autofile` is a generic version of [[plugins/autoindex]]'s code,
 so the latter should probably use the former. --[[smcv]]
 
 `add_autofile` is a generic version of [[plugins/autoindex]]'s code,
 so the latter should probably use the former. --[[smcv]]
 

+> [[merged|done]] --[[Joey]] 
+

 ----
 
 ----
 

-[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/autoindex-autofile author="[[smcv]]"]]
+[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/ready/autoindex-autofile author="[[smcv]]"]]

 
 I'm having trouble fixing this:
 
 
 I'm having trouble fixing this:
 


@@ -11,10 +13,16 @@ I'm having trouble fixing this:
        # the rest should perhaps be added to the autofile machinery
 
 By "a generic version of" above, it seems I mean "almost, but not
        # the rest should perhaps be added to the autofile machinery
 
 By "a generic version of" above, it seems I mean "almost, but not

-quite, entirely unlike". I tried digging through the git history for the
+quite, entirely unlike".
+
+> As long as it's not Tea. ;) --[[Joey]] 
+
+I tried digging through the git history for the

 reasoning behind the autofile and autoindex implementations, but now I'm
 mostly confused.
 
 reasoning behind the autofile and autoindex implementations, but now I'm
 mostly confused.
 

+## autofile
+

 The autofile machinery records a list of every file that has ever been proposed
 as an autofile: for instance, the tag plugin has a list of every tag that
 has ever been named in a \[[!tag]] or \[[!taglink]], even if no file was
 The autofile machinery records a list of every file that has ever been proposed
 as an autofile: for instance, the tag plugin has a list of every tag that
 has ever been named in a \[[!tag]] or \[[!taglink]], even if no file was


@@ -23,11 +31,90 @@ already exist (or whatever) are deferred until after this list has been
 updated, and files in this list are never auto-created again unless the wiki
 is rebuilt.
 
 updated, and files in this list are never auto-created again unless the wiki
 is rebuilt.
 

+This avoids re-creating the tag `create-del` in this situation, which is
+the third one that I noted on
+[[todo/auto-create tag pages according to a template]]:
+
+* create tags/create-del manually
+* tag a page as create-del
+* delete tags/create-del
+
+and also avoids re-creating `auto-del` in this similar situation (which I
+think is probably the most important one to get right):
+
+* tag a page as auto-del, which is created automatically
+* delete tags/auto-del
+
+I think both of these are desirable.
+
+However, this infrastructure also results in the tag page not being
+re-created in either of these situations (the first and second that I noted
+on the other page):
+
+* tag a page as auto-del-create-del, which is created automatically
+* delete tags/auto-del-create-del
+* create tags/auto-del-create-del manually
+* delete tags/auto-del-create-del again
+
+or
+
+* create tags/create-del-auto
+* delete tags/create-del-auto
+* tag a page as create-del-auto
+
+I'm less sure that these shouldn't create the tag page: we deleted the
+manually-created version, but that doesn't necessarily mean we don't want
+*something* to exist.
+
+> That could be argued, but it's a very DWIM thing. Probably best to keep
+> the behavior simple and predictable, so one only needs to remember that
+> when a page is deleted, nothing will ever re-create it behind ones back.
+> --[[Joey]]
+
+>> Fair enough, I'll make autoindex do that. --s
+
+## autoindex
+

 The autoindex machinery records a more complex set. Items are added to the
 set when they are deleted, but would otherwise have been added as an autoindex
 (don't exist, do have children (by which I mean subpages or attachments),
 and are a directory in the srcdir). They're removed if this particular run
 wouldn't have added them as an autoindex (they exist, or don't have children).
 
 The autoindex machinery records a more complex set. Items are added to the
 set when they are deleted, but would otherwise have been added as an autoindex
 (don't exist, do have children (by which I mean subpages or attachments),
 and are a directory in the srcdir). They're removed if this particular run
 wouldn't have added them as an autoindex (they exist, or don't have children).
 

-Still researching why there's this difference, and whether one or the other
-would be better for all cases...
+Here's what happens in situations mirroring those above.
+
+The "create-del" case still doesn't create the page:
+
+* create create-del manually
+* create create-del/child
+* delete create-del
+* it's added to `%deleted` and not re-created
+
+Neither does the "auto-del" case:
+
+* create auto-del/child, resulting in auto-del being created automatically
+* delete auto-del
+* it's added to `%deleted` and not re-created
+
+However, unlike the generic autofile infrastructure, `autoindex` forgets
+that it shouldn't re-create the deleted page in the latter two situations:
+
+* create auto-del-create-del/child, resulting in auto-del-create-del being
+    created automatically
+* delete auto-del-create-del; it's added to `%deleted` and not re-created
+* create auto-del-create-del manually; it's removed from `%deleted`
+* delete auto-del-create-del again (it's re-created)
+
+and
+
+* create create-del-auto
+* delete create-del-auto; it's not added to `%deleted` because there's no
+    child that would cause it to exist
+* create create-del-auto/child
+
+> I doubt there is any good reason for this behavior. These are probably
+> bugs. --[[Joey]] 
+
+>> OK, I believe my updated branch gives `autoindex` the same behaviour
+>> as auto-creation of tags. The `auto-del-create-del` and
+>> `create-del-auto` use cases work the same as for tags on my demo wiki. --s