+> I've looked this over, fixed the indenting, fixed some variable names
+> ("$foo" is a bad variable name), removed a gratuotuous use of `tie`,
+> fixed a bug (the first time it was run, it tried to write the png file
+> before the teximages/ directory existed) and checked the result in.
+>
+> Can you please flesh out [[plugins/teximg]] with
+> whatever documentation people who know tex will expect to see?
+
+Okay, I'll fill this up today I think with information about the plugin
+
+Done. Is that docu fine with you?
+
+>> Perhaps add some documentation about the kind of tex code that can be
+>> used, or a link to some documentation so people who don't know latex
+>> well can figure this out?
+
+> Also, please review my changes. In particular, I changed the @badthings
+> array to use qr//, which is much clearer, but it needs to be tested that
+> I didn't break the checking code when I did it. It would be nice to write
+> a test case that tries to feed it bad code and makes sure it rejects it.
+
+I'll test this now on my server. I'll report here later.
+Okay, checked. it works fine. My blacklist tests were successfull.
+
+>
+> Does it really make sense to have an alt tag for the image
+> that contains the tex code? Will that make any sense when browsing
+> without images?
+
+Mh.. For people who know latex very well this would be enough to imagine how the image would look like.
+This are of course the minority of people (but I guess also the minority of people are using non-gui browsers).
+