IkiWiki generates HTML in rst files pretty much all the time. As
such, we should enable raw HTML support. --Ethan
+> [[done]], although I did add a news item about it, since it could break
+> the security of certian setups that don't use the htmlscrubber. --[[Joey]]
+
<pre>
Index: IkiWiki/Plugin/rst.pm
===================================================================
);
print html[html.find('<body>')+6:html.find('</body>')].strip();
";
-</pre>
\ No newline at end of file
+</pre>
+
+----
+
+Does the Perl version of this plugin still exist? There appears to be no "rst.pm" in the current distribution; all there is is the python version. --Peter
+
+> No, only the python version exists. It does have `raw_enabled` set.
+> --[[Joey]]
+
+I am sorry, but I am confused. Does this mean that I can use Ikiwiki
+features that translate to HTML in rst files? For example, when I use a
+\[[pagename]]-style link in a rst file, the page generated by Ikiwiki's rst
+plugin says <a href="./../pagename/">pagename</a> as text. The link
+is expanded correctly, but the result isn't interpreted as HTML. Is that
+what is supposed to happen? --Peter
+
+> `raw_enabled` allows you to use the
+> [raw directive](http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html),
+> but this is not used by ikiwiki for wikilinks or anything else.
+> That's why the [[plugin_page|plugins/rst]] has its note about
+> issues with wikilinks and directives. You'd have to put those inside
+> raw directives yourself to avoid rst escaping their result. --[[Joey]]
+
+You can also create a raw "role" which is at least easier than raw directives.
+
+ .. role:: ikiwiki(raw)
+ :format: html
+
+ :ikiwiki:`\[[WikiLink]]`
+
+A role assigns meaning to interpreted text (for example :acronym:`ABC`) or :PEP:`8`. --ulrik [kaizer.se]