+[[!template id=gitbranch branch=jon/pagespec_alias author="[[Jon]]"]]
[[!tag patch wishlist]]I quite often find myself repeating a boiler-plate
[[ikiwiki/pagespec]] chunk, e.g.
I wrote the following plugin to achieve this:
- commit f3a9dd113338fe5d2b717de1dc69679ff74e2f8d
- Author: Jon Dowland <jmtd@debian.org>
- Date: Tue May 3 17:40:16 2011 +0100
-
- new plugin: alias.pm - pagespec aliases
-
- diff --git a/IkiWiki/Plugin/alias.pm b/IkiWiki/Plugin/alias.pm
- new file mode 100644
- index 0000000..b8d4574
- --- /dev/null
- +++ b/IkiWiki/Plugin/alias.pm
- @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
- +package IkiWiki::Plugin::alias;
- +
- +use warnings;
- +use strict;
- +use IkiWiki '3.00';
- +
- +sub import {
- + hook(type => "getsetup", id=> "alias", call => \&getsetup);
- + hook(type => "checkconfig", id=> "alias", call => \&checkconfig);
- +}
- +
- +sub getsetup () {
- + return
- + plugin => {
- + description => "allows the definition of pagespec aliases",
- + safe => 1,
- + rebuild => 1,
- + section => "misc",
- + },
- + pagespec_aliases => {
- + type => "string",
- + example => {"image" => "*jpg or *jpeg or *png or *gif or *ico" },
- + description => "a set of mappings from alias name to pagespec",
- + safe => 1,
- + rebuild => 0,
- + },
- +}
- +
- +sub checkconfig () {
- + no strict 'refs';
- + no warnings 'redefine';
- +
- + if ($config{pagespec_aliases}) {
- + foreach my $key (keys %{$config{pagespec_aliases}}) {
- + my $value = ${$config{pagespec_aliases}}{$key};
- + # XXX: validate key?
- + my $subname = "IkiWiki::PageSpec::match_$key";
- + *{ $subname } = sub {
- + my $path = shift;
- + return IkiWiki::pagespec_match($path, $value);
- + }
- + }
- + }
- +}
- +
- +1;
+ <snip old patch; see git branch outlined above>
I need to reflect on this a bit more before I send a pull request. In
particular I imagine the strict/warnings stuff will make you puke. Also, I'm
an existing wishlist item.
> I think it would make sense to have "pagespec" in the name somehow.
->
+
+>> Good idea, how about `pagespecalias`? — [[Jon]]
+
> No, the strict/warnings does not make me puke. Have you read my perl
> code? :-P
>
> Well, except that websetup doesn't currently support configuring hashes
> like used here. Which is a pity, but has led me to try to avoid using
> such hashes in the setup file.
->
+
+> > If I removed the `getsetup` subroutine, it would not be exposed via
+> > website, is that right? I suppose it doesn't hurt to validate key, even if
+> > this risk was not there. Is the use of a hash here a blocker for adoption?
+> > — [[Jon]]
+
> Have you considered not defining the pagespec aliases in the setup file, but
> instead as directives on pages in the wiki? Using pagestate could store
> up the aliases that have been defined. It could however, be hard to get
> an alias `foo` would need to somehow depend on the page where the alias
> was defined. --[[Joey]]
+> > I haven't thought the dependency issue through beyond "that might be hard".
+> > Personally, I don't like defining stuff like this in pages, but I appreciate
+> > some do. There could be some complex scenarios where some pages rely on a
+> > pagespec alias defined on others; and could have their meanings changed by
+> > changing the definition. A user might have permission to edit a page with a
+> > definition on it but not on the pages that use it, and similar subtle permission
+> > bugs. I'm also not sure what the failure mode is if someone redefines an alias,
+> > and whether there'd be an unpredictable precedence problem.
+> > How about both methods? — [[Jon]]
+
Here's an example setup chunk:
pagespec_aliases:
> Probably needs to be `or internal(*)` --[[Joey]]
+> > Ah yes, could be, thanks. — [[Jon]]
+
> another useful pagespec alias for large maps:
basewiki: "sandbox or templates or templates/* or ikiwiki or ikiwiki/* or shortcuts or recentchanges or wikiicons/*"
>> Useful indeed! --[[Joey]]
+
+>>> I've tweaked my patch in light of your above feedback: The plugin has been
+>>> renamed, and I now validate keys. I've also added documentation and tests
+>>> to the branch. I haven't read rubykat's code properly yet, and don't have
+>>> access at the time of writing (I'm on a beach in Greece ☺), but I expect it
+>>> would be possible to extend what I've got here to support defining the
+>>> aliases in a PageSpec, once the dependency stuff has been reasoned out
+>>> properly.
+>>>
+>>> I'd like to solve the issue of this not being web-configurable by
+>>> implementing support for more nested datatypes in [[plugins/websetup]]. —
+>>> [[Jon]]
+
+>>>> Well, it's a difficult problem. websetup builds a form using
+>>>> CGI::FormBuilder, which makes it easy to build the simple UI we have
+>>>> now, but sorta precludes anything more complicated. And anything with
+>>>> a nested datatype probably needs a customized UI for users to be able
+>>>> to deal with it. I don't think websetupability need be a deal-breaker
+>>>> for this patch. I personally like special pages like Kathryn is doing
+>>>> more than complex setup files. --[[Joey]]
+
+>>>>> I've ran out of time to keep working on this, so I'm just going to
+>>>>> submit it as a 'contrib' plugin and leave things at that for now.
+>>>>> — [[Jon]]
+
---------------------------
Based on the above, I have written an experimental plugin called "subset".
Unfortunately I haven't figured out how to do the dependencies - I'd really appreciate help on that.
--[[KathrynAndersen]]
+
+> > Cool! I like the caching idea. I'm not sure about the name. I don't like defining
+> > stuff in pages, but I appreciate this is a matter of taste, and would be happy with
+> > supporting both. — [[Jon]]
+
+>>> I've now gone and completely re-done "subset" so that it is less like an alias, but it a bit clearer and simpler:
+>>> instead of having a separate "match_" function for every alias, I simply have one function, "match_subset"
+>>> which takes the name of the subset. Thus a \[[!subset name="foo"...]] would be called `subset(foo)` rather than `foo()`.
+
+>>> There are a few reasons for this:<br/>
+>>> (a) it's more secure not to be evaluating code on the fly<br/>
+>>> (b) it's simpler<br/>
+>>> (c) (and this was my main reason) it makes it possible to do caching without having to have a separate "subset" argument.
+>>> I've done a bit of a hack for this: basically, the PageSpec is checked to see if the very start of the PageSpec is `subset(foo) and` or if the whole pagespec is just `subset(foo)` and if either of those is true, then it does the subset caching stuff.
+>>> The reason I check for "and" is that if it is "subset(foo) or something" then it would be an error to use the subset cache in that case.
+>>> The reason I just check the start of the PageSpec is because I don't want to have to do complex parsing of the PageSpec.
+
+>>> As for defining subsets in the config rather than on pages, I perfectly understand that desire, and I could probably add that in.
+
+>>> As for the name "subset"... well, it's even less like an alias now, and "alias" is already a reserved name. What other names would you suggest?
+
+>>>--[[KathrynAndersen]]
+
+>>>> Regarding my comments: I wasn't clear what you are/were intending to
+>>>> achieve with your modifications. I've aimed for a self-contained plugin
+>>>> which could be merged with ikiwiki proper. I think I initially took your
+>>>> developments as being an evolution of that with the same goal, which is
+>>>> why I commented on the (change of) name. However, I guess your work is
+>>>> more of a fork than a continuation, in which case you can call it
+>>>> whatever you like ☺ I like some of the enhancements you've made, but
+>>>> having the aliases/subsets/"things" work in any pagespec (inside map, or
+>>>> inline) is a deal-breaker for me. — [[Jon]]
+
+>>>>> I'm a bit confused by your statement "having the aliases/subsets/"things" work in any pagespec (inside map, or inline) is a deal-breaker for me".
+>>>>> Do you mean that you want them to work in any pagespec, or that you *don't* want them to work in any pagespec? -- [[KathrynAndersen]]
+
+>>>>>> I mean I would want them to work in any pagespec. — [[Jon]]