update for rename of recentchanges.mdwn to json.tl.ph.mdwn

[git.ikiwiki.info.git] / doc / bugs / notifyemail_fails_with_some_openid_providers.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/bugs/notifyemail_fails_with_some_openid_providers.mdwn b/doc/bugs/notifyemail_fails_with_some_openid_providers.mdwn
index c4542c8d02357952b1eea3f7c45b287a0f263ae9..c0610af82f02d4460b0ca6aa6d786f6ce77ec5e3 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/bugs/notifyemail_fails_with_some_openid_providers.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/notifyemail_fails_with_some_openid_providers.mdwn
@@ -95,3 +95,19 @@ Any other ideas? --[[anarcat]]
 >>>> this doesn't seem to be a very big security issue that would merit implementing a new verification mechanism, especially since we don't verify email addresses on accounts right now. what we could do however is allow password authentication on openid accounts, and allow those users to actually change settings like their email addresses. however, I don't think this should be blocking that functionality right now. --[[anarcat]]
 >>>>
 >>>> besides, the patch I am proposing doesn't make the vulnerability worse at all, it exists right now without the patch. my patch only allows users that **don't** have an email set (likely because their openid provider is more discreet) to set one... --[[anarcat]]
 >>>> this doesn't seem to be a very big security issue that would merit implementing a new verification mechanism, especially since we don't verify email addresses on accounts right now. what we could do however is allow password authentication on openid accounts, and allow those users to actually change settings like their email addresses. however, I don't think this should be blocking that functionality right now. --[[anarcat]]
 >>>>
 >>>> besides, the patch I am proposing doesn't make the vulnerability worse at all, it exists right now without the patch. my patch only allows users that **don't** have an email set (likely because their openid provider is more discreet) to set one... --[[anarcat]]

+
+>>>>> Maybe this is too much paint for one bikeshed, but I guess the email-verification idea seems worthwhile to me
+>>>>> and not terribly hard to implement (though I'm not stepping forward at the moment) ... store it with a flag
+>>>>> saying whether it's verified, send a magic cookie to it, let the user supply the cookie to toggle the flag.
+>>>>> I could also see leaving the email field hidden for OpenID login, but perhaps detecting the first use of a new
+>>>>> OpenID (it's not in the userdb, right?) and suggesting a stop on the preferences page, where if the provider
+>>>>> did supply an e-mail address, it could be already filled in as default (maybe still unverified if we don't want
+>>>>> to assume the provider did that). -- Chap
+
+>>>>>> So yay, I want a poney too, aka i agree that email verification would be nice.
+>>>>>>
+>>>>>> But the problem is that is a separate feature request, which should be filed as a
+>>>>>> separate [[wishlist]] item. What I am describing above is an actual *bug* that should be fixed regardless of
+>>>>>> the color you want that poney to be. :p -- [[anarcat]]
+
+Considering the doom and death surrounding OpenID these days, I think I'll just give up on this patch for now, especially given how little acceptance it has found here. So [[done]]. --[[anarcat]]