-Duplicate %links ?
-------------------
-
-I notice code in the scan hook that seems to assume
-that %links will accumulate duplicate links for a page.
-That used to be so, but the bug was fixed. Does this mean
-that po might be replacing the only link on a page, in error?
---[[Joey]]
-
-> It would replace it. The only problematic case is when another
-> plugin has its own reasons, in its `scan` hook, to add a page
-> that is already there to `$links{$page}`. This other plugin's
-> effect might then be changed by po's `scan` hook... which could
-> be either good (better overall l10n) or bad (break the other
-> plugin's goal). --[[intrigeri]]
-
->> Right.. well, the cases where links are added is very small.
->> Grepping for `add_link`, it's just done by link, camelcase, meta, and
->> tag. All of these are supposed to work just link regular links
->> so I'd think that is ok. We could probably remove the currently scary
->> comment about only wanting to change the first link. --[[Joey]]
-
->>> Commit 3c2bffe21b91684 in my po branch does this. --[[intrigeri]]
-
-Name of toplevel index page
----------------------------
-
-Normally at the top index page of a wiki, you see the wiki name at
-the top. However, at the top *translated* index page, you see something
-like "index.da". --[[Joey]]
-
-> I suggest changing `Render.pm`, line 115, to replace the `$page eq 'index'`
-> test with a predicate call such as isindexpage($page). Such a predicate
-> function could then be overriden by the po plugin. --[[intrigeri]]
-
->> Could do that, but if you have such a function it's natural to want to
->> use it elsewhere. Not clear to me it would make sense for po to override
->> such a function if it were used in some of the other places that compare
->> to index.
->>
->> The other option would be for po to override the template setting.
->> --[[Joey]]
-