> problem. You can see the feed validator complain about it here:
> <http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidj.org%2Frss.xml>
>
-> It's sorta unfortunate that [[cpan XML::Feed]] doesn't just assume the
+> It's sorta unfortunate that [[!cpan XML::Feed]] doesn't just assume the
> un-esxaped html is part of the description field. Probably other feed
> parsers are more lenient. --[[Joey]]