thoughts

[git.ikiwiki.info.git] / doc / todo / latex.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
index 09208b432efba5322f597f5959643700b2d57e6e..56d3b1c0cf9c26c0e93a8318a6140adfb0900e5c 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 How about a plugin adding a
-[[preprocessor_directive|preprocessordirective]] to render some given LaTeX
+[[preprocessor_directive|ikiwiki/directive]] to render some given LaTeX
 and include it in the page?  This could either render the LaTeX as a PNG via
-[[debpkg dvipng]] and include the resulting image in the page, or perhaps
+[[!debpkg dvipng]] and include the resulting image in the page, or perhaps
 render via [HeVeA](http://pauillac.inria.fr/~maranget/hevea/index.html),
 [TeX2page](http://www.ccs.neu.edu/~dorai/tex2page/tex2page-doc.html), or
 similar. Useful for mathematics, as well as for stuff like the LaTeX version
@@ -167,13 +167,16 @@ Okay, the last version of the tex plugin for ikiwiki can be downloaded [here](ht
 > fixed a bug (the first time it was run, it tried to write the png file
 > before the teximages/ directory existed) and checked the result in.
 > 
-> Can you please flesh out [[plugins/tex]] with
+> Can you please flesh out [[plugins/teximg]] with
 > whatever documentation people who know tex will expect to see?
 
 Okay, I'll fill this up today I think with information about the plugin
 
 Done. Is that docu fine with you?
 
+>> Perhaps add some documentation about the kind of tex code that can be
+>> used, or a link to some documentation so people who don't know latex
+>> well can figure this out?
 
 > Also, please review my changes. In particular, I changed the @badthings
 > array to use qr//, which is much clearer, but it needs to be tested that
@@ -181,6 +184,7 @@ Done. Is that docu fine with you?
 > a test case that tries to feed it bad code and makes sure it rejects it.
 
 I'll test this now on my server. I'll report here later.
+Okay, checked. it works fine. My blacklist tests were successfull.
 
 >
 > Does it really make sense to have an alt tag for the image
@@ -193,11 +197,11 @@ This are of course the minority of people (but I guess also the minority of peop
 
 
 > I'm thinking about renameing the preprocessor directive to teximg.
-> \[[teximg code="" alt="foo"]] makes sense.. Would it make sense to rename
+> \[[!teximg code="" alt="foo"]] makes sense.. Would it make sense to rename
 > the whole plugin, or do you think that other tex stuff should go in this
 > same plugin?
 
-I'll think over this until I'm at work ;) Only for rendering images... not for generating .tex files ...
+I'll think over this until I'm at work ;) Only for rendering images... not for generating .tex files .../wiki/
 the name is all the same i think. If you like teximg better than switch :)
 
 
@@ -212,5 +216,5 @@ Ah yes.. sorry forgot to update the plugin in my public_html folder %-). This wa
 > 
 > --[[Joey]]
 
-[[tag soc]]
-[[tag wishlist]]
+[[!tag soc]]
+[[!tag wishlist]]