+ > I don't think multimarkdown is a good solution. It served a useful
+ > purpose when we were defaulting to [[!cpan Text::Markdown]] or to
+ > `markdown.pl`, but now that we're using Discount by default,
+ > Multimarkdown is mostly a trap for the unwary - it's a less predictable
+ > and (in general) less featureful parser than Discount. Ideally we'd
+ > always be using CommonMark or Discount these days, but as
+ > far as I know there's still no API-stable CommonMark library. --[[smcv]]
+
+ > > Sure - but then does discount introduce those identifiers in headings?
+ > >
+ > > > Only if you ask for a table of contents, which ikiwiki doesn't.
+ > > > If you want it to have a flag to produce the IDs even without enabling
+ > > > its built-in ToC support, that would be a feature request for discount,
+ > > > not ikiwiki. Until/unless it does, there's always headinganchors. --s
+ > >
+ > > And what about the patch to recycle those identifiers? --[[anarcat]]
+ > > >
+ > > > I already merged it, and added a regression test. Sorry, I forgot
+ > > > to close this todo at the time. --s
+